0
gramsci is called theoretician of super structure because he criticised the theory of marx who emphasised upon the importance of sub structure. in opposition to this gramsci said that super structure plays an inpependant role in determining the society.here super strucyure refer to the "ideas"...
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the names of some superstructures?
euro tunnel cn tower burj khalifah calgary tower
How much did Roy Lichtenstein sell whaam for?
Type your answer here... 156'950'000 It was regared as one of the most famous paintings ever. (Next to the mona lisa)
How was rome like the city of mohenjo-daro?
Mohenjo-Daro was built around 2600 BCE. It was built in what is present day Pakistan. The layout of the city was based on a grid, and the buildings were mainly built of brick. There were about 40,000 people living in the city, and the city was divided into two parts. The lower half of the city held the marketplace and a well.
Why did the ideology of paternalism gain currency among planters in the 19th century?
For the slaveowners, paternalism allowed them to think of themselves as benevolent and to justify their appropriation of their slaves' labor. Paternalist ideology, they believed, also gave the institution of slavery a more benign face and helped deflate the increasingly strong abolitionist critique of the institution. ----------------------- Genovese examined the society of the slaves. This book won the national Bancroft Prize in History. Genovese viewed the antebellum South as a closed and organically united paternalist society that exploited and attempted to dehumanize the slaves. Genovese paid close attention to the role of religion as a form of resistance in the daily life of the slaves because slaves used it to give themselves a sense of humanity. He redefined resistance to slavery as all efforts by which slaves rejected their status as slaves, including their religion, music and the culture they built. Genovese applied Antonio Gramsci's theory of cultural hegemony to the slave South. He placed paternalism at the center of the master-slave relationship. Both masters and slaves embraced paternalism, though for different reasons and with varying notions of what paternalism meant. For the slaveowners, paternalism allowed them to think of themselves as benevolent and to justify their appropriation of their slaves' labor. Paternalist ideology, they believed, also gave the institution of slavery a more benign face and helped deflate the increasingly strong abolitionist critique of the institution. Slaves, on the other hand, recognized that paternalist ideology could be twisted to suit their own ends, by providing them with improved living and working conditions. Slaves struggled mightily to convert the benevolent "gifts" or "privileges" bestowed upon them by their masters into customary rights which masters would not violate. The reciprocity of paternalism could work to the slaves' advantage by allowing them to demand more humane treatment from their masters.
Harold Joseph Laski theory of right's?
HAROLD LASKI'S THEORY OF RIGHTSDifferent definitions of rights touch but partial aspects of what rights are. Jefferson's declaration that the men are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights was one which indicated the naturalness of rights, i.e., men have rights because they are, by nature, human beings. Those men (including women) have rights or that they should have rights is a fact no one would like to dispute. But this fact does not state anything more or less than that. There is no definition stated in this fact.Holland defines rights as "one man" capacity of influencing the act of others, not by his own strength of the society." His definition describes rights, as a man's activities blessed by the society which means that Holland is describing rights only as a social claim. That there are other aspects of rights in a definition of rights has not been given due place. Wilde, in his definition of rights gives a casual treatment to the social claim aspect when he says: "A right is a reasonable claim to freedom in the exercise of certain activities."Bosanquet and Laski, in their definitions of rights, include the positions of society, and state and man's personality, but they too ignore the important aspects of 'duty' as a part of 'rights'. Bosanquet says, "A right is a claim recognized by society and enforced by the state". According to Laski, "Rights are those conditions of social life without which no man can seek, in general, to be himslef at his best."Harold Laski's TheoryHarold Laski (1983-1950), a theoretician of the English Labour Party and a Political Scientist in his own right, has his definite views on the system of rights as expounded in his A Grammarof Politics (first published in 1925 and then revised almost every second year).Laski's views on the nature of rights run as follows: (1) they are social conditions, given to the individual as a member of the society; (ii) they help promote individual personality, his best-self: 'those social conditions without any man can seek to be his best self'; (iii) they are social because they are never against social welfare; they were not there before the emergencies of society; (iv) the state only recognize and protects rights by maintaining them; (v) rights are never absolute: absolute rights are a contradiction in terms; (vi) they are dynamic in nature in so far as their contents change according to place, time and conditions; (vii) they go along with duties; in fact, duties are prior to rights; the exercise of rights implies the exercise of duties.If Laski were to give rights to the individual, he would give them in this order: right to work, right to be paid adequate wages, right to reasonable hours of labour, right to education, right to choose one's governors, followed by other rights. Laski's argument is that without granting economic rights first, an individual cannot enjoy his political rights: political liberty is meaningless without economic equality: 'where there are great inequalities, the relationship between men is that of the master and the slave'. Equally important, but lower in order is the right to education: education alone helps an individual exercise these other rights properly. With the economic and social (education rights) at one's disposal, there is a greater likelihood of the individual exercising his political rights in the right earnestness.Rights are of numerous kinds. Those rights which are available to human beings include: right to life, equality, security of person and property, freedom, education, work, freedom of religion, to vote, to hold public office. The liberal democratic societies lay more emphasis on personal and political rather than economic and social rights. The socialist societies advocate the opposite arrangement of rights. Laski, as liberal leaning towards the Left, considers rights essential for individual development but grants economic rights followed by social and political rights.
What are the release dates for Extreme - 2009 Superstructures?
Extreme - 2009 Superstructures was released on: USA: 2009
What is the part of speech for regared?
It is a noun
What are the ratings and certificates for Superstructures of America - 2002?
Superstructures of America - 2002 is rated/received certificates of: USA:TV-PG
What is Antonio Gramsci's birthday?
Antonio Gramsci was born on January 22, 1891.
When was Antonio Gramsci born?
Antonio Gramsci was born on January 22, 1891.
When did Antonio Gramsci die?
Antonio Gramsci died on April 27, 1937 at the age of 46.
When was Gramsci the philosopher alive?
Gramsci the philosopher, full name Antonio Gramsci was born on the 22nd January 1891. His death was on 27th April 1937 in Rome, Italy. He lived across a century change.
How do you pronounce Antonio Gramsci?
Antonio Gramsci is pronounced as ahn-TOE-nee-oh GRAM-shee.
How do you pronounce Gramsci?
"grom-shee"
How old is Antonio Gramsci?
Antonio Gramsci was born on January 22, 1891 and died on April 27, 1937. Antonio Gramsci would have been 46 years old at the time of death or 124 years old today.
What are the ratings and certificates for Superstructures of America - 2002 Reach for the Sky 1-2?
Superstructures of America - 2002 Reach for the Sky 1-2 is rated/received certificates of: USA:TV-PG
What actors and actresses appeared in Superstructures of America - 2002?
The cast of Superstructures of America - 2002 includes: Buzz Aldrin as Himself - Astronaut Neil Armstrong as Himself - Astronaut Paul Goldberger as himself
