It is important to be able to test the hypothesis because testing your hypothesis is how you prove or disprove your theories. If it is disproved then you can change your hypothesis.
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
.... to improve our philospy
Scientists first create an hypothesis. They develop methods to prove their hypothesis. In order for other scientists to replicate the findings and prove or disprove another scientist's outcome, the original scientist MUST describe the methods used and the findings.
The National Science Education Standards define scientific inquiry as "the diverse ways in which scientists study the natural world and propose explanations based on the evidence derived from their work. Scientific inquiry also refers to the activities through which students develop knowledge and understanding of scientific ideas, as well as an understanding of how scientists study the natural world." DEPENDS ON GRADE LEVLE
by falling in a hole
The first step is to be curious about something. As your curiosity grows, you may begin to wonder about how something works, or why it changes in certain ways when certain kinds of forces act upon it. Your curiosity may lead you to start developing specific ideas about what is going on. Some of these ideas may come quickly, and some may take longer to develop. Your hypothesis is your speculation about how something actually works. One important thing about a scientific hypothesis that distinguishes it from other kinds of speculations is that the hypothesis should be testable in the real word. If you have some kind of speculation or hypothesis that by its nature cannot be tested in a tangible way, then it is not a good scientific hypothesis. Maybe you can rethink it and restructure it so that it is testable, or maybe you have to accept that your hypothesis is not very good, at least as far as science goes.
The first step is to be curious about something. As your curiosity grows, you may begin to wonder about how something works, or why it changes in certain ways when certain kinds of forces act upon it. Your curiosity may lead you to start developing specific ideas about what is going on. Some of these ideas may come quickly, and some may take longer to develop. Your hypothesis is your speculation about how something actually works. One important thing about a scientific hypothesis that distinguishes it from other kinds of speculations is that the hypothesis should be testable in the real word. If you have some kind of speculation or hypothesis that by its nature cannot be tested in a tangible way, then it is not a good scientific hypothesis. Maybe you can rethink it and restructure it so that it is testable, or maybe you have to accept that your hypothesis is not very good, at least as far as science goes.
A fundamental requirement of science is that is should be possible to make predictions based the theories which should be testable. That is, it should be possible to develop a good hypothesis which could be used to distinguish between the theory being false or acceptable.
once a hypothesis has been supported in repeated experiments, scientists can begin to develop a theory.
once a hypothesis has been supported in repeated experiments, scientists can begin to develop a theory.
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community.* Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
It is important to develop a scentific hypothesis that is testable because then you can make a hypothesis to your experiment to see if it is true or not. If it is not true then you will put that on your lab paper that your hypothesis is not true and you will have explain your hypothesis.
Science is based on the principle of falsifiability. It is necessary to develop a hypothesis based on the current understanding. You then make a prediction and design tests or experiments which will either disprove the hypothesis or add support in favour of the scientific theory.
When scientists develop a scientific law or theory they follow the scientific method. They first develop a hypothesis and then test their hypotheses in order to record any reactions or occurrences. Once they have performed enough tests to either prove or disprove their hypothesis they can state a scientific law or theory.
The scientific method is a step-by-step process used to explore a scientific query or hypothesis. # Ask a question # Do research # Form a hypothesis # Test the hypothesis through experimentation # Analyze results and develop a conclusion # Communicate results to peers # Peer analysis
He would develop an experiment. He has already made his hypothesis, he already drew his conclusion, and has already analyzed his data. To develop an experiment is the last possible thing for him to do. Good luck on whatever you needed this for hun. ;)
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.