Because multiple experiments can be tried to prove just one theory. When humans get involved there are a multitude of factors that sometimes can't and don't get taken into account as well.
They are both measures of the probability of an event occurring.
They are the same. They are probabilities that are calculated from some theoretical model of the experiment using scientific laws.They are the same. They are probabilities that are calculated from some theoretical model of the experiment using scientific laws.They are the same. They are probabilities that are calculated from some theoretical model of the experiment using scientific laws.They are the same. They are probabilities that are calculated from some theoretical model of the experiment using scientific laws.
I have no clue I'm wondering the same thing!
yes
Absolutely not. Experimental is practical and theoretically anything is possible.
They are methods of obtaining the probability of an event.
All that it means is that you have chosen to divide up the event space into events that are equally likely.
The percentage yield is the Actual Yield divided by the Theoretical Yield, all multiplied by 100. Percentage = [(Actual)/(Theoretical)] x 100
Yes. It's not likely they'd be exactly the same, but there's no theoretical reason that they couldn't be very, very close to within any reasonable amount of experimental error.
No. Non-experimental is NOT experimental . Quasi- experimental is fake or partially experimental . Not following the protocols of a true experiment .
They are exactly the same
No. p-values are probabilities but they are not the only ones.