IT TOOK HUNDRED OF YEARS OF EXPERIMENTS TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT SPONTANEOUS GENERATION DEOS NOT OCCUR. i'm not lieing :)
Spontaneous generation was called a mistaken idea by the scientific community because it was based on incorrect assumptions about the origins of living organisms. The discovery of microorganisms and advancements in microbiology showed that living organisms do not arise from non-living matter spontaneously. This led to the rejection of spontaneous generation as a scientific explanation for the origins of life.
Spontaneous Generation was the idea that life spontaneously arose from rotten food. For example, if I left a hamburger outside for a couple days and maggots began to cover it, during the time period that spontaneous generation was accepted, I would have believed that the maggots came from nothing.
Spontaneous generation is the now-discredited belief that living organisms can arise from non-living matter under certain conditions. This concept was prevalent in early scientific thought but was eventually disproven by experiments conducted by Louis Pasteur and others in the 19th century.
Spontaneous generation was commonly believed in ancient times, with early proponents including Aristotle and alchemist Paracelsus. However, the idea was eventually discredited through the experiments of scientists like Francesco Redi and Louis Pasteur in the 17th and 19th centuries, respectively.
Spontaneous Generation is the belief that living things can be created from inanimate objects. Aristotle was the one who created this hypothesis. It was an explanation of the origin of life before it was scientifically proven wrong.
Spontaneous generation
spontaneous generation means the mistaken idea that living things arise from nonliving sources. so it has nothing to do with protecting your food.
Spontaneous generation was called a mistaken idea by the scientific community because it was based on incorrect assumptions about the origins of living organisms. The discovery of microorganisms and advancements in microbiology showed that living organisms do not arise from non-living matter spontaneously. This led to the rejection of spontaneous generation as a scientific explanation for the origins of life.
Spontaneous generation is a mistaken idea because living things do not arise from non-living matter. Instead, all living organisms come from pre-existing living organisms through processes like reproduction. This idea was debunked by Louis Pasteur's experiments in the 19th century.
What was supposed to be meant for the idea of spontaneous generation was that living things arise from living things through REPRODUCTION!!!!!!!!!!!BY ANDY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!AND RICHARD!MY ANSWERSThe definition of spontaneous generation is the mistaken idea that living things can arise from nonliving sources.Which is impossible because you cant get something that lives from something that don't live. As if up top living things arise from living things through REPRODUCTION
What was supposed to be meant for the idea of spontaneous generation was that living things arise from living things through REPRODUCTION!!!!!!!!!!!BY ANDY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!AND RICHARD!MY ANSWERSThe definition of spontaneous generation is the mistaken idea that living things can arise from nonliving sources.Which is impossible because you cant get something that lives from something that don't live. As if up top living things arise from living things through REPRODUCTION
A spontaneou generation is the idea that organisms originate directly from nonliving matter
Redi and Pasteur helped to disprove spontaneous generation.
It was to answer whether or not Spontaneous generation is possible or not.
Redi and Pasteur
bogenisis-theory that living things come only from other living things . spontaneous generation-idea that living things come from nonliving things.
spontaneous generation