Consider a box being pulled by two people in the top and the right direction. If the person who is pulling the box from the right is the stronger person, he exerts more force on the box [i.e, the magnitude of the force exerted toward the right is higher], it is more likely that the box will move in his direction. Quite similarly, when considering the resultant of two vectors, the resultant is bound to be closer to the higher magnitude. I hope that made sense.
it is closer to the center
Integers: 6001. Real numbers: There is no such number. You can get closer and closer, yet there will always be a smaller number (6000.1, 6000.01, 6000.001, ... you can go on and on).
One can define an infinite number of fractions to successively approximate pi, and get closer and closer to pi's value. There is no closest fraction to pi. No matter how close the fraction is to pi you can always find one that is closer.
To determine which number is closer to one million, we can compare their magnitudes. The magnitude of 1.2 multiplied by 10 raised to the power of 5 is 1.2 million, which is 200,000 short of one million. On the other hand, the magnitude of 1.3 multiplied by 10 raised to the power of 6 is 1.3 million, which is only 100,000 short of one million. Therefore, 1.3 10 raised to the power of six is closer to one million.
He calculated the perimeters of regular polygons inscribed within a unit circle and circumscribing the circle (outside the circle). The first is always less than the circumference of the circle ( = 2*pi) and the second is always more. As you increase the number of sides of the polygons, the polygons get closer and closer to the circle and their perimeters get nearer to the circumference.
Having your arms wider apart will yield a smaller magnitude than if your arms were closer together. A resultant with a smaller magnitude means less force to counter your weight, hence a harder pull-up
Apparently a magnitude estimate is just a estimate just closer to the actual answer.
it is closer to the center
One dimmer star can be closer than a brighter star that is far away. Light flux decreases as the square of the distance. A star that is three times as far away will have to shine nine times brighter than the closer star (absolute magnitude) to appear to have the same magnitude (apparent magnitude). Because apparent magnitude is the brightness of a star, as seen from Earth, whereas absolute magnitude is the brightness of a star as seen from the same distance - about 32.6 light years away.
Venus has the greatest visual magnitude when viewed from Earth.Note: one might think Jupiter would have the greatest visual magnitude, but Jupiter is quite far away from Earth, and reflects back much less sunlight than the inner planets.
7.0. That is STRONG, plus the focus was near earth's surface, so it felt stronger than an earthquake with a 7.0 magnitude but with a focus closer to the middle of the earth would feel.
The absolute magnitude is referred to a constant, standard distance, so it doesn't change. But the apparent visual brightness increases (magnitude number decreases), because as you climb the vertical axis, you obviously move closer to the star.
Mercury is always closer to the Sun than the moon.
The apparent magnitude is what we see, and this can be measured directly. The absolute magnitude must be calculated, mainly on the basis of (1) the apparent magnitude, and (2) the star's distance. So, to calculate the absolute magnitude, you must first know the star's distance.
The greater a star's magnitude, the brighter it appears in the sky. Magnitude is a scale of apparent brightness as seen from Earth and says nothing about how large a star actually is or how much energy it is radiating. A small star that is closer may have a greater magnitude, as seen from Earth, than a large, active star that is much further away.
Mercury is always the closest planet to our sun.
when the 2 objects are moving each other by the gravitation, the magnitude will be zero.