Want this question answered?
Yes it is valid. The atom bomb proves that E=mc2 is valid.
Einsteins laws are the most complex laws ever made but do not match with quantum physics they are still really valid though
Guessing, inventing data.
forecast what it is supposed to predict
Yes, if the pressure is low.
No, it is not
Nothing. CaCl2 is a valid formula.
Aluminum III chloride is not a valid chemical formula.
No, they are different.
Yes it is valid. The atom bomb proves that E=mc2 is valid.
The #REF! error.
No. There is no equals sign at the start and the cell reference B2B3 is not valid or has an operator missing. A possible formula variation on it could be:=B1-B2+B3No. There is no equals sign at the start and the cell reference B2B3 is not valid or has an operator missing. A possible formula variation on it could be:=B1-B2+B3No. There is no equals sign at the start and the cell reference B2B3 is not valid or has an operator missing. A possible formula variation on it could be:=B1-B2+B3No. There is no equals sign at the start and the cell reference B2B3 is not valid or has an operator missing. A possible formula variation on it could be:=B1-B2+B3No. There is no equals sign at the start and the cell reference B2B3 is not valid or has an operator missing. A possible formula variation on it could be:=B1-B2+B3No. There is no equals sign at the start and the cell reference B2B3 is not valid or has an operator missing. A possible formula variation on it could be:=B1-B2+B3No. There is no equals sign at the start and the cell reference B2B3 is not valid or has an operator missing. A possible formula variation on it could be:=B1-B2+B3No. There is no equals sign at the start and the cell reference B2B3 is not valid or has an operator missing. A possible formula variation on it could be:=B1-B2+B3No. There is no equals sign at the start and the cell reference B2B3 is not valid or has an operator missing. A possible formula variation on it could be:=B1-B2+B3No. There is no equals sign at the start and the cell reference B2B3 is not valid or has an operator missing. A possible formula variation on it could be:=B1-B2+B3No. There is no equals sign at the start and the cell reference B2B3 is not valid or has an operator missing. A possible formula variation on it could be:=B1-B2+B3
Chicago.CHI is not valid as a molecular formula; such a compound could not possibly be stable.
carbon chloride is not a valid name for cny chemical
The usual formal charge for lithium is +1, and one of the common valences for sulfur is -2, so yes, that would be a valid formula.
small signal operations
That's not a valid empirical formula. Assuming you meant aluminum chloride and just didn't know the real formula, it's AlCl3 with four atoms per formula unit.