If a hypothesis does not generate any observational tests, there is nothing that a scientist can do with it
Read more: Explain_why_a_hypothesis_must_be_testable
ANS2:If an hypothesis is not testable, it cannot be provable false. If it cannot be provable false it cannot be supported. If it cannot be supported, it adds nothing to science.An hypothesis is a "no-win" proposition. You need to try to prove it false. That being the case, you either prove it false (lose) or you fail to prove it false (lose). Failing to prove an hypothesis false is the basis for supporting it.
capable of being proven false. testable
testable
In Karl Popper's terminology there must be a way to prove a hypothesis false. That is what it means when scientists say that a specific hypothesis is a "testable hypothesis".
It must be possible to observe whether the hypothesis is true.
It must be testable.
It must be testable.
It must be possible to observe whether the hypothesis is true.
A hypothesis must be testable and able to be proved false because it is an educated guess based on other facts connected to the hypothesis. It must be testable so other scientists can agree with the hypothesis. It is not able to be provable because it is an educated guess.
so it can be proven
It must be testable.
Yes. A hypothesis must be testable to become a theory.
It must be testable, and must be falsify-able