cuase they don't have mass
You can see a rainbow whenever there's water in the air. It doesn't matter what time it is, as long as either the sun or the moon is in a clear patch of sky.
a rainbow
I'm guessing it has something to do with how a rainbow starts after it rains.
The rainbow has a name, but it's the scientific name. Rainbow also goes by Moonbow. But, rainbow is called rainbow because the colors in the rainbow. ROYGBIV when you see a rainbow its called a spectrum. ROY G. BIV is the name... for RED, ORANGE, YELLOW, GREEN, BLUE, INDIGO, VIOLET...
No. The center of the rainbow is always directly in front of you, opposite the sun. If you move, the rainbow moves.
No. A rainbow is just refracted light which is not matter.
Does it matter
A rainbow is the refraction of visible light by water vapour; therefore it is matter in the form of electromagnetic energy.
A rainbow is a sign that God will always love us, no matter what we do and how bad we mess up. <3
Rainbow puffles are nonexistent no matter what people will tell you. It is impossible to get one.
That is purely a matter of opinion
A rainbow is not matter, it is light which is a form of energy.
You can see a rainbow whenever there's water in the air. It doesn't matter what time it is, as long as either the sun or the moon is in a clear patch of sky.
The formula is the rainbow, the boot with grass, the frog, and then the little alien. The order doesn't matter
Follow your own rainbow would be synonymous with the more common saying, follow your dream. Do what you really want to do, no matter how impractical it may seem (which is not always the best advice, as it turns out).
This is totally a matter of personal preference and how you use your cards. If you have an abundance of continuous traps, Uria will be very useful. However, if you are in possession of a Crystal Beast deck, Rainbow Dragon will(obviously)be more useful.
Let's assume you mean this question in a general sense where matter has mass. Then No. If you require the objects to have atoms. then really No. There are (probably) blackholes that have mass but not "matter". There are hypothetical "quarkstars" and "neutron stars" that you might not want to define as "matter". So maybe Yes....