0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When would a historian use a calendar?
Historians would use calendars all the time. They are a major part of their work. They are constantly using dates and checking up on them, so calendars are essential to them. They could not work without calendars.
What are the many reasons historains give for the fall of the roman empire?
It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.
What Might people gain from having a ruler whose power is totalor absolute?
Your question could raise a lot of controversy, but here is one answer. What people gain by having a absolute ruler depends solely upon the character of the ruler. Some could be benign, others tyrants. Generally there is peace and even some prosperity under a sole ruler. In today's world, we tend to think that the ideal form of government is some type of democracy. However it has been proven several times over that certain countries simply are not ready for the democratic process and in order to stop civil unrest, they need a "strongman".
What date did the first crusade start?
This question denotes a specific 'date' as seems to have been mentioned by 'Dark wizard 3' which is a bit troublesome as more or less all of the crusading bodies set off at different times in 1096. If you would like a specific date to pin it down on I would probably prescribe the 27th of November 1095 because this is the date which Pope Urban gives his speech at Clermont - this is the beginning of the Crusade in my eyes.I would also like to refute the previous answer to this question which suggests the crusades were somehow started as a result of Muslims wanting Jerusalem - the city had been there for the better part of 400 years and as such this is complete nonsense and pseudo-history. No historian would agree with this absurd understanding of the First Crusade. For more information I advise reading the works of Jonathan Philips or if you're just looking for a light overview then Geoffrey Hindley's 'The Crusades' (which has an expanded title but google that and it will come up).Hope that helps!
How much did a horse cost during the Middle Ages?
The price of a horse, according to a Medieval Sourcebook (link below) was 10 to 20 shillings for a draft hourse, but could go to twenty times that, or more, for a fine riding horse or a war horse. At that time, a laborer would earn about forty shillings per year, according to the same source. The source shows a lot of variation in prices, so should not be taken as absolute.
How would a future historian describe you?
a historian would describe your life by you telling him all about you and your family.
Would a historian look at 1916?
Yes. A historian would look at any year. Lots of historic events happened in 1916 around the world that would be of great interest to a historian.
What information would the cultural historian receive that the economic historian would not?
Stories about the experience of being unemployed
What information would a cultural historian receive that the economic historian would not during the Great Depression?
B. Stories
When would a historian use a time line?
A historian would use a timeline to establish the order events happened.
What would you study in science if you studied chronology?
If you studied chronology, you would learn how to measure fixed periods of time and to compile events and epochs by arranging them in the order that they occurred within a time frame.
What is an example of a chronological?
A chronology is a specific ordering, usually from earliest to most recent. The easiest example of data listed in a chronology is a life chronology. In a life chronology you would list dates of important events in your life. In this personal chronology, you'd pick what is "important" enough to include, but generally, it would include your date of: birth, baptism, first school year, graduation year, marriage year, etc. A chronology can put into order any facts about any person or object, for example "books written by one author". A subject chronology might be to "put into order by publication date all books written by Sigmund Freud."
Use chronology in a sentence?
Chronology means to put something in order. For example, "The series of books was a chronology of the history of England".
When would you make a references absolute?
When would I make a reference absolute
Why would a chef need to follow a chronology?
to make sure that the recipe is right
Which is correct an historian or a historian?
Both "an historian" and "a historian" are correct, but generally "a historian" is more commonly used. The use of "an historian" follows British English rules of using "an" before words that begin with a silent 'h'.
Which would be you be Treasurer or Reporter or Historian?
The one that would be the treasurer would be the one that is good with numbers. The historian should enjoy researching the past and a reporter should be interested in finding out the truth.
