Want this question answered?
pollution is less due to organic agriculture as compared chemical intensive agriculture
Pollution is a very serious problem in our world.
Don't cause pollution!
Hydrogen atoms are less dense than the air, therefore hydrogen balloon rises in air.
solid with hydrogen bonds making it less dense than its liquid form
hydrogenA2:Coal is the fuel that produces the least pollution among the choices. Hydrogen would be the least polluting except for the reality that hydrogen is produced by burning coal to produce electricity to electrolyse water. Only if the electricity used to produce the hydrogen were produced by hydro, wind or solar, would hydrogen be less polluting than coal.
New fueling stations that can handle hydrogen would have to be built.
Challenges to hydrogen as fuel include no distribution network, ie gas stations, and fear that the car co u l d explode like the Hindenburg.
less pollution
yes i does cause less pollution but it can't run cars
Some benefits of hydrogen vehicles are: less pollution, less dependence on foreign oil, less vehicle costs, and not having to purchase gasoline. These vehicles are great for the environment.
It is debatable. Natural gas has the smallest carbon to hydrogen ratio of any fossil fuel, which means it produces less carbon dioxide per unit of energy than any other fossil fuel. The impurities such as hydrogen sulfide can be easily removed via the Claus process, avoiding toxic emissions of sulfur dioxide when the fuel is burned. On the other hand natural gas is still a fossil fuel and still produces carbon dioxide when burned, which is the major contributor to anthropogenic global warming.
The direct pollution of a hydrogen-powered car is just water vapor, which is very clean. However, the TOTAL pollution of a hydrogen-powered car is higher than a fossil-fuel powered car. Pure hydrogen is difficult to obtain here on Earth. You need to make the hydrogen by breaking down other compounds that contain hydrogen, and that often takes a lot of either electric energy or natural gas. The electricity needed to break down water into hydrogen and oxygen generally comes from coal or natural gas, both fossil fuels. So, hydrogen cars or electric cars are just a way of sending the pollution someplace else, not eliminating it completely.
The smaller stars generally live longer due to less mass & less hydrogen is burned.
Far less than fossil fuels. The amount of nuclear fuel required to make a certain amount of energy is tiny compared to fossil fuels, and therefore produces far less pollution. Most of the pollution is from mining the nuclear fuel, the only pollution from burning the fuel is "heat pollution", where the cooling towers dump waste heat into a lake or ocean and the temperature changes the ecosystem.
Yes you should. They will cause less pollution.
It makes people switch to new fuel sources.It leaves less pollution in the ground.It makes less air pollution in Poland.It cleans the coal so there is no waste.