Because a semi colon replaces the word "but" which means it's more complex.
There was a period of history in which science was not known to the human race. Instead of science, mythology and superstition were the basis of human understanding of the world.
Well first.. I would research information about the world. And then I would talk about it. That is how you explain the world.
At the end of this sentence we had to put a period.
Can some one answer please Can some one answer please
conception occurs appr 2 weeks after ur last period not before because if you got pregnant before your period your period would not come on conception occurs appr 2 weeks after ur last period not before because if you got pregnant before your period your period would not come on
to Join two independent clauses where the second clause explains the first (apex)
Yes, you can use a comma instead of a semicolon to connect two closely related independent clauses, but it is important to ensure that the sentence maintains its clarity and grammatical correctness.
One example of using a semicolon is to connect two related independent clauses in a sentence, such as: "She finished her work; then she went home." The semicolon acts as a stronger break than a comma but not as final as a period.
It is necessary to put the semicolon between Indianapolis and worse. Many writers would merely use a comma in this case, but that would be incorrect. Sorry, but I am sticking to my original opinion that you don't need a semicolon here. I agree that a comma wouldn't be appropriate, but a period would be advisable.
In some cases, yes. It's usually a bad idea, however; the more common usage is for the semicolon to precede the word. It may help to ask yourself "would this still make sense if the semicolon were a period?" If so, then the semicolon is probably in the right place. There's really no reason to ever use a semicolon if you don't know how to do it properly. 99 44/100 % of the time a period will work almost as well. (The 0.56% where it won't? Programming languages.)
No, the word "and" should not follow a semicolon. Semicolons are used to separate independent clauses; if you want to include "and," it would typically be used within one of the independent clauses separated by the semicolon.
That would be a winking smiley face emoticon. ;)
If you're constructing a sentence that has two independent clauses connected by a semicolon and the first sentence happens to end with a quotation mark, hypothetically, the semicolon would go inside of the ending quotation mark. This is rarely the case, though. Typically, quotations end in either a comma and a conjunction, a single comma, or simply a period.
A semicolon is used to join two independent clauses together. An example of two independent clauses joined together via semicolon is: "Baum's book is a political allegory; few people today would recognize the political events in this story."
Commas are over-used. If writing is clear enough they can probably be eliminated altogether. Think of them as indicating when you would make a natural pause in a sentence. Semicolons are different; they indicate a break in a sentence where you could alternatively put a full stop, or period. As a very general rule, if you can replace a semicolon with a full stop/period and both sections of the sentence can stand alone as sentences, then the semicolon is probably ok. Commas indicate places where a natural pause occurs in the sentence. Semicolons separate predicates that can each stand alone as proper sentences.
The quotation mark would go before the semicolon, because the semicolon represents the beginning of a new thought in the same sentence.
The quotation mark would go before the semicolon, because the semicolon represents the beginning of a new thought in the same sentence.