Depends. DO u believe that if the witches had not prophesized anything, would u still think his intents were still evil and on usurping the throne? We aren't left to know, but one thing i can say was he is only human, so... hope that helps. Just think about it.
I think that Macbeth is a victime of fate because the start of his killings and actions begin from when Lady Macbeth and the 3 witches provoke him.
In Act 3, Scene 5, lines 27-29, the three witches or weird sisters talk about how they're going to confuse and trick him. Therefore, deciding what will happen to him and deciding his fate. He does not know the the weird sisters are after his life and what they say is exactly what ends up happening.
As well, Lady Macbeth continuously states how Macbeth isn't a man, thus provoking him to prove to her that he is. It is not something he wanted to do but Lady Macbeth forced him. once again, choosing his fate for him.
MacBeth died because of his yearn for more power.
He was killed because the oracles said no man born of a woman can kill you. The oracles tricked him into beleiving he was invincible and therefore could usurp the throne from the king. He was killed by a man who was birthed through C-section so he was not 'born' of woman. Power corrupted him and led to his demise.
It's a result of free will.He is a human so he has a mind to differentiate between the good and the bad,he could have listened to Banquo's words instead of following his own desires and his evil wife.
Macbeth would not have killed Duncan if he had not been pushed into it by his wife, and she does not seem to have thought of the idea of being queen until she heard about what the witches said. So no, Macbeth would probably not have killed Duncan had the witches not told him the prediction. However, he might have become king anyway even without killing Duncan.
Macbeth was strongly tempted to take the actions he chose, but in the end they were always his choice.
yes it was
No, Oedipus is not an innocent victim of an unjust fate in "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles (495 B.C.E. - 405 B.C.E.). Specifically, Theban King Oedipus hears that he is fated to be his father's killer and his mother's husband. The fate is unjust. But Oedipus makes panic stricken choices that make possible the very fate that he so seeks to avoid.
1) Macbeth taking his own fate into his own hands 2) Macbeth believing the withes' advice
He should tell himself that it is not his fault because as the three witches prophesied, it is fate and fate is inevitable.
This question assumes that a driving force behind Macbeth's actions was "obsessive ambition". In fact, his character is shown to be anything but obsessively ambitious. When not under the influence of his wife, his thoughts turn towards such ideas as "if fate would have me king, why then fate must crown me", and "I have won golden opinions of all sorts of people which would be worn in their newest gloss, not cast away so soon." It is Lady Macbeth who is obsessed with the possibility of Macbeth becoming king. Macbeth only starts to become evil after he has attained the highest office which his ambition could aspire to, which means that he only became evil after he lost all of his ambition.
The purpose of the witches at the beginning of the play is to set the scene and introduce the theme of fate vs. free will that is incorporated throughout the entire novel, and it gives an idea of how Macbeth will be affected by these witches. :)
No, Oedipus is not an innocent victim of an unjust fate in "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles (495 B.C.E. - 405 B.C.E.). Specifically, Theban King Oedipus hears that he is fated to be his father's killer and his mother's husband. The fate is unjust. But Oedipus makes panic stricken choices that make possible the very fate that he so seeks to avoid.
"He shall spurn fate" in the story of Macbeth refers to Macbeth's belief that he is invincible and can overcome destiny or fate. This phrase reveals his arrogance and disregard for the eventual repercussions of his actions, leading to his downfall. Ultimately, Macbeth's actions go against the natural order, resulting in tragedy.
1) Macbeth taking his own fate into his own hands 2) Macbeth believing the withes' advice
He should tell himself that it is not his fault because as the three witches prophesied, it is fate and fate is inevitable.
This question assumes that a driving force behind Macbeth's actions was "obsessive ambition". In fact, his character is shown to be anything but obsessively ambitious. When not under the influence of his wife, his thoughts turn towards such ideas as "if fate would have me king, why then fate must crown me", and "I have won golden opinions of all sorts of people which would be worn in their newest gloss, not cast away so soon." It is Lady Macbeth who is obsessed with the possibility of Macbeth becoming king. Macbeth only starts to become evil after he has attained the highest office which his ambition could aspire to, which means that he only became evil after he lost all of his ambition.
Destiny is a result of choices made based on free will by an individual. Fate is a result of circumstances beyond the control and regardless of the choices made by an individual.
This phrase means that if fate or luck wants you to become a king, then fate may also take away that same position from you. It emphasizes the unpredictable nature of fate and how circumstances can change unexpectedly.
The purpose of the witches at the beginning of the play is to set the scene and introduce the theme of fate vs. free will that is incorporated throughout the entire novel, and it gives an idea of how Macbeth will be affected by these witches. :)
It's likely that Macbeth would not have killed Duncan if the witches had not planted the idea of his kingship in his mind. While Macbeth struggled with ambition, the witches' prophecy ignited and intensified his desires, leading him to take action. Without the witches, it's possible that Macbeth's fate would have unfolded differently.
In the poem "Fate," fate is portrayed as an uncontrollable force that determines the course of one's life despite their efforts to resist or change it. The poem suggests that fate is inevitable and ultimately shapes a person's destiny regardless of their actions or choices.
Your teacher probably wants you to say fate or fortune. It's not true, but it's the sort of thing that teachers say. In actuality, most of the characters in Shakespeare's plays are not controlled by fate or fortune. The play where fate seems to play the greatest role is Romeo and Juliet, who seem to be least in control of what is going on around them, and the least in Coriolanus, who makes his choices while seeing very clearly where they are going to take him. If the events in Othello are out of Othello's control, they are very much in Iago's control, not in the hands of some impersonal fate. The witches in Macbeth have been viewed as agents of fate, but it is Macbeth's actions to try to fulfill or thwart the witches' prophecies (and he does both) that shape the action of the story.
The three witches in Macbeth represent fate, the supernatural, and the destructive potential of unchecked ambition. They serve as instigators of Macbeth's downfall by providing prophecies that manipulate his actions and lead him to his tragic end.