There are two main processes of decomposition with biological organisms, those being Aerobic and Anaerobic. Aerobic occurs in the presence of the element Oxygen. The Latin prefix "An" means "not", so anaerobic occurs when there is no oxygen present.
Aerobic processes are generally faster, since oxygen is an accelerant, or more specifically, it causes decomposition to occur more rapidly than if it were not present. Oxygen is generally considered neither a fuel not a catalyst, though it can be the latter in specific instances (see: Oxygen oxygen).
Since a vacuum has a distinct lack of Oxygen, the process would become anaerobic as soon as the internal oxygen within the object (body, piece of cheese, tomato, et al) ran out.
Additionally, the vacuum adds other considerations. The item under examination would also desiccate (or dry out) as the volatiles, such as water, moved to the vacuum. Lacking both water and elemental oxygen, virtually all biological processes would cease.
It could last forever, with no significant deterioration, if the vacuum were maintained, so not only would decomposition be slower, it would completely cease.
Light travels faster (up to the speed of light) in a vacuum, which is empty space. Light travels slower through a medium (matter).
No, slower. Light travels fastest in a vacuum. Anything transparent that light can pass through slows it down somewhat. Diamond crystal slows it down notably, which is part of what causes the "fire" in a diamond.
light travels faster in vacuum.
The speed of light IN A VACUUM is always the same. In substances other than the vacuum, the speed of light is usually slower than in a vacuum.
Vacuum filtration is far faster.
No, slower.
As compared to what? Compared to air, or to a vacuum, light travels quite a bit slower in water.As compared to what? Compared to air, or to a vacuum, light travels quite a bit slower in water.As compared to what? Compared to air, or to a vacuum, light travels quite a bit slower in water.As compared to what? Compared to air, or to a vacuum, light travels quite a bit slower in water.
In a vacuum, light travels at a constat speed. It won't get faster or slower over time. In other substances (e.g., in water) light moves at a speed determined by the characteristics of the substance. Here, it won't get slower or faster with time, either.
What do you mean, make it faster? In a vacuum, light travels at only one speed. There is no way to make it faster or slower. In other materials, light is usually slower. There are instances where it is actually measured to be faster, but it is generally believed that this can't be used to transfer matter, energy, or information, faster than the speed of light.
Radio waves travel with the highest speed in vacuum, and slightly slower in air. So they move slightly faster in space than on earth.
No, Mach 20 is not faster than the speed of light. The speed of light is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second in a vacuum, while Mach 20 is roughly 7.35 kilometers per second. Therefore, Mach 20 is significantly slower than the speed of light.
The speed of light in a vacuum is 300,000 kilometers per second (or 300 million meters per second). In a vacuum, light can ONLY move at that speed - neither faster, nor slower.
In order for heat to be conducted, there have to be collisions between atoms or molecules, in which energy is transferred from a faster moving particle to a slower moving particle. In a vacuum there are no particles, hence, no particle collisions and no heat conduction.
Light travels faster (up to the speed of light) in a vacuum, which is empty space. Light travels slower through a medium (matter).
Yes, that is correct. (Slower than in a vacuum.)
Speed of light is max. in vaccum and slower in air.
It travels faster in a vacuum.