0
They are completely different things.
The mass of an object is the amount of matter or "stuff" of which the object is composed. It is an intrinsic property of the object itself and it doesn't change, regardless of where the object goes or what kind of environment or conditions it's subjected to.
The weight of an object is the force that exists, trying to accelerate the object in one direction.
Most often, the force comes about because of the gravitational attraction between the object and another nearby body, such as the earth. If that same object is moved to another gravitational environment ... such as the surface of the moon ... its weight changes.
On the International Space Station, either the object has no weight at all, or ... if the station is spinning ... it has a little bit of weight.
Which of these is the correct weight ? They all are. Each one is correct in that particular environment, because the weight depends on the environment, whereas the mass is an inherent property of the object, and it doesn't change.
What else can I help you with?
Is molecular weight the same as mass?
Technically... not really. It would perhaps be more accurate to use the terms formula mass and molecular mass rather than formula weight and molecular weight. This because in physical terms, weight is a force while mass is a measure of the amount of substance in something.
What are the advantages of using a graduated cylinder than a ruler?
well with a graduated cylinder you can measure liquid
What is larger millimeters or kilograms?
Kilograms are larger than millimeters. Kilograms measure mass or weight, while millimeters measure length or distance.
Which is bigger gram or a meter?
These two things can not be compared in this fashion because grams is a measure of weight, and meters are a measure of length.
Why using pounds to measure weight is better than using something like rocks?
Using pounds to measure weight is better than using rocks because pounds are a standardized unit of measurement that is universally understood. Rocks can vary in size and weight, making them inconsistent for measurement purposes. Additionally, pounds are part of the International System of Units (SI) and are widely used in various industries and contexts.
Mass is a better measure of the amount of matter than weight is because mass is independent of location or dependent?
Yes, mass is a measure of the amount of matter in an object and is constant regardless of location or gravitational influence. Weight, on the other hand, depends on the gravitational force acting on the object, so it can change based on the location in the universe.
Why might scientists measure the mass of an object rather than the weight of an object.?
The mass of an object does not change , but its weight can vary.
Why is mass better than weight?
Mass is a measure of the amount of matter in an object, while weight is the force of gravity acting on that object. Mass remains constant regardless of the gravitational field, whereas weight can vary depending on the strength of gravity. In scientific contexts, mass is preferred because it is an intrinsic property of an object, whereas weight depends on the environment.
Why might scientists measure the weight of an object rather than the weight of an object?
The mass of an object does not change , but its weight can vary.
Why do scientist measure and record the mass other than the weight?
The mass is a measure of the amount of matter present in an object whereas weight is a measure of the force on the object due to gravity. Weight is measured in Newtons, mass is measured in kilograms (pounds in the Imperial system) When we use the term weight outside of science we actually are referring to mass. mass is a measure of 'stuff,' of material that makes up an object. weight is the gravities affect on mass as you can see from the equation Fg=mg, m=mass g=gravity (on earth it is 9.8) and fg is weight in newtons
Why might scientists measure the mass if an object rather than the weight of an object?
Scientists might measure the mass of an object rather than its weight because mass is an intrinsic property of an object that does not change with location, while weight depends on the gravitational pull at a particular location. Mass provides a consistent and accurate measure of the amount of matter in an object, which is useful for making comparisons and calculations in science.
Which one deals with weight liters or kilograms?
Neither. Litres measure volume, and kilograms measure mass. It's worth noting, though, that mass is more closely related to weight than volume is.
Why might scientist measure the mass of an object rather than the weight of an object?
The mass of an object does not change , but its weight can vary.
Is weight caused by the gravatational force acting on mass?
Yes, and you can do even better than that.Weight IS the gravitational force on a mass.
Is molecular weight the same as mass?
Technically... not really. It would perhaps be more accurate to use the terms formula mass and molecular mass rather than formula weight and molecular weight. This because in physical terms, weight is a force while mass is a measure of the amount of substance in something.
Why might a scientists measure the mass of and object rather than the weight of an object?
Scientists may measure the mass of an object rather than its weight because mass is an intrinsic property of the object that remains constant regardless of its location or the gravitational force acting on it. Weight, on the other hand, is the force exerted on an object due to gravity, and can vary depending on the gravitational field strength.
How much cups is one lb white sugar?
It will be slightly less than 2 cups. You should measure weight when baking! Cups is a measure of volume. Pounds is a measure of weight and mass. You can not directly convert the two.
