In terms of chemistry class, all vitamins are organic molecules because they are made of carbon backbones with various functional groups and reactive sites on them. In terms of marketing, there is no such thing as an "inorganic" vitamin - the choice would be between "organic" and "synthetic". Here the difference is what exactly made the vitamin - the actual vitamin is the exact same thing.
no, vitamins are essentially organic compounds
In organic chlorine compounds, chlorine atom is attached to a carbon. In inorganic, it will generally be bonded to non-carbon atoms.
By tradition organic molecules are those which contain carbon.
Organic animals are living organisms that are composed of organic compounds, such as proteins, fats, and carbohydrates. Inorganic animals, however, do not exist as animals in the traditional sense, as animals are by definition organic beings. Inorganic substances can have animal-like structures or functions, but they are not considered animals.
All organic compounds contain carbon; most inorganic compounds doesn't contain carbon.
it is organic
Basically, organic compounds have carbon. Inorganic do not.
Basically, organic compounds have carbon. Inorganic do not.
It is organic substance
nothing
no, vitamins are essentially organic compounds
Basically, organic compounds have carbon. Inorganic do not (though there are some exceptions).
An organic molecule contains carbon, whereas an inorganic molecule does not.
one has "in" in the organic. therefore the inorganic is much heavy for the use of having "in" infront of "organic"
Basically, organic compounds have carbon. Inorganic do not (though there are some exceptions).
Basically, organic compounds have carbon. Inorganic do not (though there are some exceptions).
No. The difference between an organic and an inorganic compound, ionic or otherwise, is that an organic compound contains carbon bonded with hydrogen while an inorganic compound does not.