Best Answer

'''The following answer, which is factually inaccurate, was taken almost verbatim from http://contenderministries.org/evolution/carbon14.php. I will leave it here in it's entirety but add in notations to better the question asker's understanding of the subject.'''

One problem is that it (Carbon-14 Dating) may not be accurate because it relies on several assumptions (or guesses) that have not been proven (using the scientific method) to be true.

1. It assumes the rate of decay of carbon-14 has remained constant over billions of years.

''Radioactive decay rates do not change. Ever.''

2. It assumes the rate of carbon-14 formation has remained constant over billions of years.

''False. See my notation after #3.''

3. It assumes the concentrations of carbon-14 and carbon-12 have remained constant in the atmosphere over billions of years.''

''

''This is false. When scientists perform carbon dating they use a calibration curve (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating#The_need_for_calibration) to compensate for varying levels of carbon 14 in the atmosphere caused by variations in the rate of carbon-14 formation. They do NOT assume the levels of carbon-14 have been constant forever.''

4. It assumes the amount of carbon-14 being presently produced had equaled the amount of carbon-12, so that it had reached a "balance" that does not change.

''This is not only false but completely made up.'''''

'''

5. It assumes all plant and animal life utilize carbon-14 equally as they do carbon-12.

''It assumes no mechanism for straining out some or all of carbon-14 and using only carbon-12. This is because no one has ever show such a mechanism to exist.'' ''

''''The reason long term carbon dating (such as for determining the age of the earth) is not accurate is that we have no idea what the carbon-14 levels were past a certain point.

''

''for the short term (less than 45,000 years) carbon dating is indeed accurate due to calibration curves allowing scientists to compensate for varying levels of carbon-14 in the atmosphere. '' So its like a blind date its not gonna go well now is it da

Study guides

☆☆

Q: What are problems with radiocarbon dating?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Chemistry

Carbon 14 is the isotope of carbon measured in radiocarbon dating.

Recent geologic events up to 75,000 years ago

carbon

The most commonly used isotope would be Carbon-14. This method is called radiocarbon dating.

similar because they both depend on spontaneous radioactive decay.

Related questions

Radiocarbon dating was discovered in 1946 by Willard Libby.

Radiocarbon dating was developed by Willard Libby in 1949.

A specialist that dates radiocarbon

Radiocarbon dating cannot be used to determine the age of fossils or "of the earth" because these materials no longer have radiocarbon or have negligible amount of radiocarbon.

Radiocarbon dating is an radioactive isotope dating technique used in dating materials which contain the unstable carbon-14 isotope. Radiocarbon dating is used to determine the age of previously living organisms.

It's radiocarbon dating, and it's finding out how old something is using radiocarbon.

It can be known as 'Radiocarbon dating' or 'Carbo-14 dating'.

Carbon 14 is the isotope of carbon measured in radiocarbon dating.

Carbon 14 is the isotope of carbon measured in radiocarbon dating.

Carbon 14 is the isotope of carbon measured in radiocarbon dating.

Yes, carbon dating and radiocarbon dating refer to the same test, which is the analysis of the carbon 14 isotope.

Radiocarbon dating can be done at a variety of research institutions including Woods Whole and UC Irvine. Radiocarbon dating is done in labs with equipment specific to carbon 14 analysis. Most radiocarbon dating labs have liquid scintillation counters for radiometric dating and accelerator mass spectrometers for AMS dating.

People also asked