answersLogoWhite

0

Here are some of them:

Missing double coincidence of wantsBarter will only take place if we both have something that the other person wants.

Example: I want an iPod, and offer babysitting services. You have a spare iPod, but have no children; you want a TV.

With money, I can sell babysitting to a third party and trade you money for the iPod, and you give those money to a fourth party for the TV.

Without money, the babysitting/iPod exchange would either not happen, or be longer and more complicated as we try to barter tomatoes, poultry, bicycles or whatever we can get hold of towards our ultimate goal.

Many goods are indivisibleUnlike money, many goods cannot be split up in smaller parts to match an offer.

Example: I want an iPod, and offer babysitting. You have a spare iPod and need babysitting services, but only for one or two nights, not enough for the babysitting to be a fair trade for the iPod.

Again, we are stuck with either no trade or a potentially very long and convoluted series of intermediate barters.

No common metric for valueInstead of valuing an iPod to an amount of money, you must be prepared to estimate its value in number of cows, haircuts, televisions and every other good and service in existence.

In a modern society you would end up with millions of "prices" on every product, as it is far from obvious how a valuation in cows translates to a valuation in bicycles.

Difficult to store wealthSaving is harder when much of what you receive is perishable (ex. tomatoes), bulky (ex. cabinet, bicycle) or require dedicated care (ex. live cattle).
User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?