That is a hard question. #1 if the animal is being put through many tests and is uncomfortable and fearful it is wrong.
#2 If the animal is being treated well and it is for a good cause it is OK
I personally think that God was the creator of animals and people and think that it should stay that way. Try also reading the Bible to help you out.
There is no specific term for people who marry animals, as marriages between humans and animals are not legally recognized or accepted in society. This behavior is considered taboo and illegal in most jurisdictions due to ethical and moral concerns.
People who mistreat their animals may face legal consequences, including fines, confiscation of the animals, or criminal charges. There can also be social repercussions, such as damage to their reputation and relationships. Additionally, animal mistreatment may indicate underlying issues that require intervention or support.
I don't think it should be leagel to have an ocelot as a pet because they are already endangered and if people have them for pets then they will come even more endendangered. SO NO!
No, it is not possible to legally marry a cat as they are non-human animals. Marriage is a legal contract between two individuals, typically humans, recognized by the government. It is not legally recognized for individuals to marry animals.
Yes! You should do it!
One would hope that if cloning were allowed, the clones would be defined as people. If they are people then they should have the same rights as people who are not cloned. If people who are not cloned have the right to clone themselves then those who are should have it as well. The word "right" can have a legal and an ethical aspect. The question might be talking about whether the practice is legal or whether it is moral. The Legal Profession treats that sort of question as money in the Bank and will vigorously defend you right to your opinion. The Religious Ethics community will likely oppose any such question until they have debated the question for several years.
There is currently no technology that can clone a full human being. While some progress has been made with cloning animals, the ethical and moral concerns surrounding human cloning have prevented it from being pursued. Additionally, cloning a specific historical figure like Thomas Edison raises significant ethical, legal, and scientific challenges.
no it's not legal to clone organisms in israel.
Many different people have a lot of different opinions.
Russian clone vkontake.ru seems to be working well without any legal issues.
No, it should be illegal.
Answer 1I do not think it should be allowed to clone humans and animals let alone anything. It is going against the Lords will, and it can cause harmful side affects in the clone. It can cause them to have mental probablems have shorter life spans. You never know when someone is cloned they might not have same rights.Answer 2This is a question whose answers are incredibly subjective depending on whether people interpret cloning as ethical or not. There are many concerns about cloning including: Would clones be considered humans? What would their rights be? As well as questions about whether it is safe to clone people and what the potential risks about clothing would be? Also, most people feel generally uncomfortable with the idea of clones existing or feel that they are unnatural, as proven by the first response to this question.cell
you cant clone yourself without a bunch of science stuff.if you did have that stuff, you wouldn't be able to clone in the united states cause its not legal
people test on animals because it is legal and cheap. their nasty freaks
it shold never, selling any animals sould be illegal its self
Absolutely not: no matter what the circumstances.
Yes because they are as important as humans