Oak is 60 MPa, with a specific strength of 86.95 kN·m/kg
Believe it or not, wood is stronger under compression, regardless of the flaws in the wood (in most cases).
no wood is not stronger than steel. yes becasue steel is stronger than wood.
Brick will usually be stronger in compression, but metals will usually be stronger in tension.
yes with baby powder
yes
A2. In a beam supported at both its ends the lower half of the beam will be under tension, and the upper half of the beam will be under compression.
Stone slabs are stronger under compression.
tension when it bends the ridges are pulling apart and thats tension
Yes. This is because the strength of wood when compressed, decreases per length unit the longer the piece of wood is. However, wood holds the same strength in tension no matter the length. In the compression boomilever, the compression chord is longer than in the tension boomilever.
Heavy, light wood is likely to break or snap under tension.
Spaghetti is stronger under tension because spaghetti is brittle and therefore a smaller yield point. This is bad for compression because compression requires a large elastic value, which spaghetti doesn't have. Because tension hardly changes spaghetti it makes it stronger than compression.
Neither tensile strength nor compressive strength is inherently "stronger." Some materials are stronger in tension; other materials are stronger in compression. For example, rope is much stronger in tension than in compression, but concrete is much stronger in compression than in tension.
no wood is not stronger than steel. yes becasue steel is stronger than wood.
Well it depends what you are using it for to me Wood clue is stronger.
tension; under a tensile stress ========================
pine wood is the answer
Makes it stronger
Marshmallows are strronger in comperesseion.