Laboratory tools makes the one thing be easier to identify.
laboratory tools make easier the job of scientist on their experiments
Laboratory tools improve the observations made by a scientist by providing precise measurements, enhancing accuracy and reproducibility of experiments, and enabling the scientist to analyze samples at a microscopic level. Additionally, these tools can allow researchers to perform experiments that would not be possible otherwise, ultimately leading to a deeper understanding of the phenomena under investigation.
Robert Brown discovered the motion of moving pollen grains. Although, a theory not long after was found out by Albert Einstein was that the water particles (very hard to see, pretty much invisible) were making these pollen grains move.
The heart was not discovered by a single scientist, as its function and importance have been known since ancient times. However, the first recorded scientific observations of the heart were made by the ancient Egyptians around 2500 BC.
Theodor Schwann and Matthias Schleiden are credited with the Cell Theory, which states that all living organisms are composed of cells. They concluded this in the 19th century based on their observations and experiments with plant and animal tissues.
The scientist has made groundbreaking discoveries in their study of spiders, including new insights into their behavior, communication methods, and the development of silk production.
laboratory tools help to make easier the job of scientist and student on the experiment....
Primarily by increasing accuracy, and next by increasing efficiency.
Laboratory tools improve the observations made by a scientist by providing precise measurements, enhancing accuracy and reproducibility of experiments, and enabling the scientist to analyze samples at a microscopic level. Additionally, these tools can allow researchers to perform experiments that would not be possible otherwise, ultimately leading to a deeper understanding of the phenomena under investigation.
kc ang baho ng pekpek nla ..
A scientist may create an hypothesis on the basis of their observations. If their observations are carelessly made or recorded then any hypotheses they offer will be inaccurate reflections of nature. A scientist may alternatively collect observations to test an hypothesis. If these observations are carelessly made or recorded then the conclusions that the scientist makes about the hypothesis could very well be incorrect. At the very least the conclusions they draw would not be based on sound evidence (because the observations are unsound).
bernoulli
Galileo Galilei
They are called measurements. Like witha ruler or stop watch.
i need to know the exact same thing
False. No scientist gets everything EXACTLY right, not even Newton or Einstein or Hawking. Brahe's observations were astoundingly accurate, and he interpreted them as well as he could, but his years of painstaking observations made it possible for others to improve on his analytical work. Wasted? Not hardly!
They made new tools and they lived around 80,000 years ago
The initial observation sets the scene for an experiment...what did you see? what was happening? How to improve it? And so on. As the experiment proceeds you record all observations..what do you see?...what is happening? Etc. At the end you note the final observations and how do they differ from the initial observations. So, Initial observation is the observations you made initially of an experiment.