If I am understanding the question correctly, I can give a simple explanaiton to the reason for repetition of an experiment. In any good scientific method process, it is the ultimate responsibility that the results of such experimentation can contain the following two factors: RELIABILITY: the ability for any other individual to perform the same experimentation under the same conditions and achieve the same result is critical. VALIDITY: the ability once the reliabilty has been established, the results can be considered without any futher "re-invention of the wheel" valid and no additional testing or experimentation is needed. (REMEMBER-- results are only valid if the same procedure over and over has yeilded the same results under the same conditions.
all know is that it would be a fair test
By repeating the experiment and getting the same results it validates those results.
repeating it
Repeating the experiment will either confirm the results you've just obtained, or show up errors.
Conclusion
because then you realize what you did wrong and fix it.
all know is that it would be a fair test
By repeating the experiment and getting the same results it validates those results.
repeating it
Repeating the experiment will either confirm the results you've just obtained, or show up errors.
When an experiment yields positive results (in support of the predictive hypothesis), a repetition that confirms the original results is called "replication." Replication by independent investigators is one of the hallmarks of science.
A repeating historical pattern is called"empires".
An action of repeating something done in an experiment.
Conclusion
It is called an experiment.
so you can get the same result and to prove your hyphothosis
Repeating an experiment helps to ensure the results are reliable and not just due to chance. Consistent results across multiple trials strengthen the conclusions drawn from the study and increase confidence in the findings.