Yes, although the matter would likely be incompetence rather than malpractice. In the US a lawsuit can be inititated under almost any circumstances. The main factor to consider before filing suit is if there are valid grounds to file and enough substantiated evidence to prove the plaintiff's claim. The more "hard" evidence the plaintiff has the better the chance of winning any type of suit.
Attorneys require lawyer malpractice insurance to protect them from lawsuits enacted by their clients. If a lawyer does what a client deems to be an insufficient or substandard job, or feels that the lawyer did not represent them properly, the client has the right to sue the lawyer. Because of this, lawyers often invest in malpractice insurance to protect themselves in case a client wishes to enact a lawsuit against them and their work.
A very good one. Search for one that specializes in malpractice.
In the book can you sue your parents for malpractice Melissa was dating mike
malpractice lawyer
If you have some sort of proof, possibly. This is a question for a medical malpractice lawyer.
You will need to find a malpractice lawyer who can sue a doctor for drugs given in the hospital. The lawyer will ask for an autopsy to be performed on the deceased.
A lawyer malpractice case starts with a client unhappy with the results. The first step in analyzing whether legal malpractice has occurred is for a lawyer to learn the reason for the attorney malpractice. The analysis of how the bad result occurred requires a review of the client's entire file. That usually requires the client to retrieve his or her file from the lawyer. It also requires that an expert lawyer consult on the standard of care applicable to your matter. Why is this important? Because most cases of legal malpractice require you to prove that had the lawyer not been negligent your results would have been better. In most cases an expert lawyer is hired to testify about the standard of care, without which you cannot prove lawyer negligence. The standard of care is what a reasonable lawyer should do under the circumstances of the representation. Basically, it means a lawyer should be competent, diligent, and loyal. A lawyer may be disloyal or act with a conflict of interest. These acts of an attorney are known as breach of fiduciary duty. This type of legal malpractice can cause you financial harm or damages. Usually the damages are pecuniary or economic only. Lawyer malpractice cases usually do not provide for compensation damages for stress, pain and suffering. If your case for malpractice involves an underlying case for bodily injury and pain and suffering is a component for that lost claim, then you may sue to obtain those lost damages. In some circumstances a lawyer may be liable to non-clients. In Arizona a claim for attorney malpractice based on negligence and breach of fiduciary duty must be filed within 2 years of you learning that your financial damages were caused by lawyer negligence or breach of fiduciary duty. Check with a lawyer in your state about the Statute of Limitations applicable to lawyer malpractice Suing a lawyer requires both knowledge of the substantive area of the law involving the malpractice and knowledge of how to pursue a claim for lawyer malpractice.
You can just about anybody for anything these days... its just a matter of whether you win or lose the case.
Maybe. Talk to a lawyer who specializes in medical malpractice.
No, but you might be able to sue a banker.
If you wish to sue your present lawyer for malpractice, you will probably want a lawyer to litigate that for you. The fact that your case was delayed or even lost is not proof of malpractice. You would need to fire your present attorney and hire an attorney to review the details of your file to determine whether you have a malpractice case.
mm