0
No one won the case Cherokee Nation v Georgia, (1831). The US Supreme Court determined it didn't have authority to hear the case under original (trial) jurisdiction because the Cherokee Nation didn't qualify as a State. Chief Justice Marshall indicated the Court would hear the case on appeal. Unfortunately, the Cherokee didn't refile in the lower courts, so their case was never officially heard.
For practical purposes, the Cherokee lost because they were unable to negotiate the federal judicial system to get a favorable ruling before the US government removed them from their ancestral land in the tragedy that became known as The Trail of Tears.
Case Citation:
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 U.S. 1 (1831)
What else can I help you with?
Did Andrew Jackson and the State of Georgia obeyed the Supreme Court ruling in Cherokee v Georgia?
no
How did the Cherokee respond to the Indian removal act?
Because of the Indian Removal Act of 1830, the Cherokee had to be relocated. Initially, the Cherokee people did not think this really pertain to them. Unfortunately, they were forced to move, anyways. They were not prepared for so many people and hundreds of Cherokee died from starvation, exposure, and illnesses.
What event resulted in the Cherokees marching at gunpoint from GA to OK 1838?
Andrew Jackson's Indian Removal Act of 1830. In the case of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, Supreme court ruled in favor of cherokees. they could keep their land. Jackson didnt care and ignored the judgment of SUPREME COURT and forced the cherokees to oklahoma (trail of tears)
How do you say YES in Cherokee Indian?
Well honey, in Cherokee, you say "yes" as "v-ha." So next time you wanna give a hearty agreement in Cherokee, just throw out that "v-ha" like you're sealing a deal with the sassiest handshake.
How do you say 'your welcome' in Cherokee?
In Cherokee, the phrase "you're welcome" can be translated as ᎦᏚᏩᏛᎢ (gaduwadv'i). The Cherokee language is a complex language with its own unique alphabet and grammar rules. The phrase is pronounced as "ga-doo-wah-dee."
Who were the plaintiff and defendant in the Cherokee Nation v Georgia case?
The plaintiff (or complainant) was the Cherokee Nation; the defendant (actually the respondent) was the State of Georgia.Case Citation:Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 U.S. 1 (1831)
What was the vote on the Cherokee Nation v Georgia case?
There was no vote in Cherokee Nation v Georgia, (1831) because the Supreme Court determined it didn't have authority to hear the case under original (trial) jurisdiction because the Cherokee Nation didn't qualify as a State. Chief Justice Marshall indicated the Court would be willing to hear an appeal, if necessary, but the case first had to be refiled in a lower court. Unfortunately, it was never refiled.Case Citation:Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 U.S. 1 (1831)
Do you agree with Jackson's refusal to enforce the Worcester v Georgia ruling?
Worcester v. Georgia ruled that the Cherokee Tribe "constituted a nation holding distinct sovereign powers." Jackson defied the Supreme Court and kicked the Cherokee out of their homes to Oklahoma. Many died on the Trail of Tears.
What was the US Supreme Court's decision in Cherokee Nation v Georgia?
The case of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, (1831), involved a question of Supreme Court jurisdiction after the state of Georgia enacted a series of laws in 1828 that stripped Native Americans of their rights, in order to annex their land and force the Cherokee to leave the state.Fearing Georgia had the support of President Jackson, John Ross, Chief of the Cherokee Nation, led a delegation to Washington to plead for relief directly from Congress, bypassing the usual process of negotiating directly with the President. Although Ross found support in Congress, it was insufficient to overturn Georgia law.Ross then appealed directly to the US Supreme Court for an injunction against Georgia's laws. The Court determined it didn't have original jurisdiction over the matter because the Cherokee Nation was not a state but a "denominated domestic dependent nation." The injunction was denied, but the Court indicated it would be willing to review the matter on appeal from the lower courts.Case Citation:Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 U.S. 1 (1831)
Why was the Supreme Court case Worcester v Georgia a small victory for the Cherokee Nation?
The Cherokees', for the first time got what they wanted.
What best describes the court decision of Worcester v Georgia in 1832?
The Cherokee Nation was politically independent with its own sovereign powers.
Who did the Cherokee sue to keep their land?
The Cherokee Nation sued the state of Georgia in 1831 and 1832 in a series of legal battles, notably in the case of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia. They sought to protect their land from being seized and to assert their status as a sovereign nation. Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled that it did not have jurisdiction in the case, leading to the subsequent forced removal of the Cherokee people along the Trail of Tears.
Which American Indian group appeared to win a legal victory against removal in Worcester v. Georgia?
In the case of Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the Cherokee Nation appeared to win a legal victory against removal. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the state of Georgia had no authority to impose laws within Cherokee territory, affirming the sovereignty of the Cherokee Nation. This decision, however, was largely ignored by both President Andrew Jackson and the state of Georgia, leading to the continued forced removal of the Cherokee people, known as the Trail of Tears.
How did President Jackson respond to the supreme court's ruling in worcester v Georgia that Georgia had no right to interfere with cherokee?
In response to the Supreme Court's ruling in Worcester v Georgia that Georgia had no right to interfere with the Cherokee, President Jackson disregarded the decision and removal of the Cherokee proceeded as planned.
Did Andrew Jackson and the State of Georgia obeyed the Supreme Court ruling in Cherokee v Georgia?
no
What was the name of the US Supreme Court case that stated the Cherokee nation was a distinct territory over which only the federal government had authority?
Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)For more information on Worcester v. Georgia and related cases, see Related Questions, below.
In which Supreme Court decision did Chief Justice John Marshall rule that Georgia had no right to interfere with the Cherokee?
In Worcester v. Georgia, (1832) Marshall expressed the opinion that the Cherokee was a sovereign nation and only the federal government had the right to regulate them. Further, the Cherokee had no obligation to follow Georgia law within their own territory. Marshall also informed Georgia that it had no right to make laws governing the use of Cherokee land.Case Citation:Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)In Worcester v. Georgia, the US Supreme Court decided the states (in this case, Georgia) had no right to redraw the boundaries of Native American territories, or to require white people to purchase a license to live on the land. As a result, the lower court decision convicting eleven missionaries of violating state law by refusing to purchase a permit to live on Cherokee land was reversed.Georgia ignored the order to stop interfering with the Cherokee's rights, and President Jackson made no effort to enforce the order because he had no legal obligation to do so, and sympathized with Georgia's interests.Case Citation:Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
