the planet is ugly
True because it is an ecosystem
lo
nothing it depends on what factor was removed
i think when one of the organ system destroyed or damaged the parts or organs will not work..and it will not take it responsibility..
If you were to kill all the organisms in one trophic level, it would disrupt the entire food chain. This disruption would affect the populations of organisms in other trophic levels, ultimately leading to ecosystem imbalance and potential collapse. Each trophic level plays a specific role in maintaining the balance and stability of an ecosystem.
Depending on the ecosystem being damaged or the scale of said damage it could have large scale or little to no affect on the ecosystem. lets say a large part of the ecosystem was destroyed then it would change the habit of almost every living creature.
The pioneer species begins an ecosystem for succession such as lichens. They start an ecosystem after the previous was destroyed or start an all new one
The pioneer species begins an ecosystem for succession such as lichens. They start an ecosystem after the previous was destroyed or start an all new one
Energy is neither created nor destroyed. It is transformed form one form to another.
True because it is an ecosystem
lo
Although trees can be replanted and they will regrow given time, you can not consider deforestation as a reversible change if it has gone too far. A forest is a living ecosystem of which the trees are just one part, if that ecosystem (all the animals and other plants) is destroyed, there is NO WAY to get back to how things were, the change is irreversible.
any part of an ecosystem that is living or was at one time
nothing it depends on what factor was removed
i think when one of the organ system destroyed or damaged the parts or organs will not work..and it will not take it responsibility..
they f**** die
One law closed the part of Boston until the colonists paid for the destroyed tea.