The difference between the microscopic world and the macroscopic world lie in their definitions. The microscopic world is so small as to only be visible with a microscope. The macroscopic world is visible to the naked eye.
In the macroscopic world, everything can be seen with the naked eye. But to see what is in the submicroscopic world, a microscope is needed. Normally, macroscopic measurements are in the range of millimeters but microscopic are usually in microns.
The macroscopic world can be seen by the naked eye. Submicroscopic world, on the other hand, cannot be seen by the naked eye, but with the use of a electronic devices a like scanning electron microscope.
How do the submicroscopic and macroscopic views of matter differ?
This is a big difference of scale; at microscopic scale more details are revealed.
Macroscopic: at a great scale, easily visible with eyes
Microscopic: at a very small scale, objects visible only with microscopes
Compare the macroscopic world with the submicroscopic world
None of the above although if I had to pick one it is most likely to fall under the submicroscope category. Chemistry is the study of chemicals molecules and elements. All of which are microscopic in singular entities but can be large enough bonded together to be visible.
Many of the macroscopic properties of a compound depend on the way in which the atoms of the molecules are held together. One macroscopic property is electric conductivity.
If you think to chemical symbols of chemical elements (not macroscopic formula) see the link below.
The chemical symbol (not formula, macroscopic sample) of neon is Ne.
A solid
the chemists goal is to understand the atoms that compose it
Chemists are interested in the submicroscopic description of matter because a submicroscopic description of matter is part of the theories of chemistry and provides explanations for macroscopic phenomena and chemical reactivity. These theories provide a means for us to apply chemistry, using it to predict other macroscopic phenomena.
Because a submicroscopic description of matter is part of the theories of chemistry and provides explanations for macroscopic phenomena and chemical reactivity - and these theories provide a means for us to apply chemistry, using it to predict other macroscopic phenomena.
None of the above although if I had to pick one it is most likely to fall under the submicroscope category. Chemistry is the study of chemicals molecules and elements. All of which are microscopic in singular entities but can be large enough bonded together to be visible.
submicroscopic
Atoms and molecules are submicroscopic and it is their behavior that determines the macro behavior of chemicals in bulk.
Electron Microscope.
The Microscopic world is the system which has the small scale(size), of order of atomic dimension (about 10 A or less), and it characterizes the properties of individual particles, but Macroscopic world is the system which has the large scale (size) which can be seen with ordinary sense (of order of one micron) and it characterize the system as as whole . Thanks...
In the macroscopic world it is not.
Microscopic is larger. The sub- prefix in submicroscopic meaning under/below.
Microscopically (what we can see through an electronic microscope), steel is seen in a shape of grains, particules, beans, but the submicroscopic strcture of steel is its crystalline structure: the ferrite is Cubic centred, austenite is cubic faced centred and martensite is like a parallelogram.
What does macroscopic mean