It was against the law for Shakespeare theater goers to cross dress. It was also against the law for people to dress above their station.
Shakespeare's father got in trouble with the law for building an unauthorized sewage pit. Shakespeare's daughter also got in trouble with the law for missing church.
Many many times. How do we know this? Because it was against the law to miss church and if you missed you had to pay a fine. If Shakespeare had made a habit of missing church it would have cost him a fortune and probably have landed him in jail.
Shakespeare had no control over who did or didn't appear on stage. It was against the law for females to appear on stage, and if they had, the audience would have been upset and have booed them off the stage anyway. But Shakespeare didn't make the law or the custom. He just had to live with it.
Hamlet!
Little is know about the private life of William Shakespeare. He probably was a law abiding citizen since his work was highly praised by the public.
No, it is not!
No. It is against the law.
If he wants to - there is no law against it !
I think so!
There is no law against it.
Young boys played female parts. It was against the law for women to act.
They should, but it's not against the law (I don't think) to not wear eye protection.
Why would you want to? No law against it, but people would mistake you for Jewish.
it is not against the law but i'd say its an new fashion
The law does not regulate clothing. It might be contrary to the rules of some school for a person to wear particular clothing under certain conditions on that school's grounds. Still, there is no law against possessing that clothing.
Shakespeare's father got in trouble with the law for building an unauthorized sewage pit. Shakespeare's daughter also got in trouble with the law for missing church.
In some countries it is because a lot of people get killed from that.