Most nuclear power plants use uranium. Once the uranium is use it can never be used again. The earth has a lot more power in buried uranium then in buried oil. Also bringing back 150KG of uranium from mars is a lot easier then bringing back 15000000gal(exact figures unknown) of oil from mars. both have the same amount of power. Is in inexhaustible, no. Pretty close to being inexhaustible, Yes
Technically, there is no such thing as "renewable" energy. Once energy is used, it can't be recovered. What is commonly called "renewable" is simply energy that can last for a long, long time. Nuclear energy is in this category.
Nuclear energy from uranium fission is not inexhaustible, because there is only a certain amount on Earth and we cannot recreate or manufacture it.
Uranium is not inexaustible, uranium is "burned" in a nuclear reactor.
yes
Nuclear energy from uranium fission is not inexhaustible, because there is only a certain amount on Earth and we cannot recreate or manufacture it. There might be supplies elsewhere in the solar system but we don't know. If nuclear fusion can be successfully developed, and this uses deuterium from the oceans, then there would indeed be an almost inexhaustible source of energy, at least there is plenty there to last mankind for many thousands of years. (That does not make it renewable though!)
There are none. The sun will eventually die, thus stopping the build-up of a pressure gradient between two areas, thus eliminating wind. After the sun is dead, plant life cannot continue so will eliminate biofuels. Nuclear energy obtained from isotopes will run out after all has been subject to nuclear fission. At the moment we cannot produce effective nuclear fusion which would be inexhaustible.
Wind energy is inexhaustible.
Because they don't run out
tidal energy is inexhaustible because we cannot use up all of the ocean. tides will still go in and out
Nuclear power is non-renewable
Yes, it could be viewed as inexhaustible through use of breeder nuclear reactors that can produce more fuel that what is consumed.
6
6
Nuclear energy from uranium fission is not inexhaustible, because there is only a certain amount on Earth and we cannot recreate or manufacture it. There might be supplies elsewhere in the solar system but we don't know. If nuclear fusion can be successfully developed, and this uses deuterium from the oceans, then there would indeed be an almost inexhaustible source of energy, at least there is plenty there to last mankind for many thousands of years. (That does not make it renewable though!)
There are none. The sun will eventually die, thus stopping the build-up of a pressure gradient between two areas, thus eliminating wind. After the sun is dead, plant life cannot continue so will eliminate biofuels. Nuclear energy obtained from isotopes will run out after all has been subject to nuclear fission. At the moment we cannot produce effective nuclear fusion which would be inexhaustible.
Nuclear energy is a non-renewable source since there is a very tiny amount of Uranium-235, whose fission results in nuclear energy. If a more abundant element could be used in nuclear reactors, such as, say, nitrogen or oxygen, it would effectively become inexhaustible. However, current technology does not allow for this since these atoms are too small to be accurately and repetitively bombarded (which is a key part of the fission process).
no coal is not an inexhaustible resource
Inexhaustible is a synonym of "limitless," with regards to items and supplies. An example of a sentence using the word "inexhaustible" is "The Roman army's supply of salt was seemingly inexhaustible. "
inexhaustible and renewable
The Inexhaustible Cab was created in 1901.
it is inexhaustible