Most nuclear power plants use uranium. Once the uranium is use it can never be used again. The earth has a lot more power in buried uranium then in buried oil. Also bringing back 150KG of uranium from mars is a lot easier then bringing back 15000000gal(exact figures unknown) of oil from mars. both have the same amount of power. Is in inexhaustible, no. Pretty close to being inexhaustible, Yes
Nuclear energy from uranium fission is not inexhaustible, because there is only a certain amount on Earth and we cannot recreate or manufacture it. There might be supplies elsewhere in the solar system but we don't know. If nuclear fusion can be successfully developed, and this uses deuterium from the oceans, then there would indeed be an almost inexhaustible source of energy, at least there is plenty there to last mankind for many thousands of years. (That does not make it renewable though!)
Wind energy is considered inexhaustible, making it a sustainable resource for generating electricity.
There are none. The sun will eventually die, thus stopping the build-up of a pressure gradient between two areas, thus eliminating wind. After the sun is dead, plant life cannot continue so will eliminate biofuels. Nuclear energy obtained from isotopes will run out after all has been subject to nuclear fission. At the moment we cannot produce effective nuclear fusion which would be inexhaustible.
It isn't really "cheap" - not if you consider the cost of safely handling the radioactive waste, which can be quite problematic. If you dump the waste into the environment, then it might be considered cheap - but you are essentially leaving the problem to others.
Fission nuclear power depends on uranium which is found in ore deposits, but clearly there is only a certain amount on Earth, so it is not renewable - current (admittedly rough) estimates are that we have several hundred years worth of usable uranium. Fusion power uses hydrogen isotopes; given the amount available through processing water from the Earth's oceans, it is effectively inexhaustible (meaning, there are several billions of years worth of hydrogen to be obtained from the Earth's oceans, which is longer than the remaining lifespan of the Earth).
Nuclear power is non-renewable
Yes, it could be viewed as inexhaustible through use of breeder nuclear reactors that can produce more fuel that what is consumed.
6
6
Nuclear energy from uranium fission is not inexhaustible, because there is only a certain amount on Earth and we cannot recreate or manufacture it. There might be supplies elsewhere in the solar system but we don't know. If nuclear fusion can be successfully developed, and this uses deuterium from the oceans, then there would indeed be an almost inexhaustible source of energy, at least there is plenty there to last mankind for many thousands of years. (That does not make it renewable though!)
"Inexhaustible" is an adjective.
Nuclear energy is a non-renewable source since there is a very tiny amount of Uranium-235, whose fission results in nuclear energy. If a more abundant element could be used in nuclear reactors, such as, say, nitrogen or oxygen, it would effectively become inexhaustible. However, current technology does not allow for this since these atoms are too small to be accurately and repetitively bombarded (which is a key part of the fission process).
Inexhaustible is a synonym of "limitless," with regards to items and supplies. An example of a sentence using the word "inexhaustible" is "The Roman army's supply of salt was seemingly inexhaustible. "
Technically the sun is exhaustible as it will eventually run out of hydrogen, but that is predicted to be 4-5 billion years in the future. Since the sun will be around for that long it is considered an inexhaustible source of energy.
inexhaustible and renewable
it is inexhaustible
The suffix for "inexhaustible" is "-ible," which means "able to be."