It hasn't been achieved yet, and it seems doubtful that it is possible. You may want to read the Wikipedia article on cold fusion to get a more detailed overview.
To summarize it: the muon-catalyzed kind definitely is possible and is routinely done by researchers in the field - the problem is that it requires more energy to generate the muons than you can get out of the fusion. The Fleischmann and Pons kind appears to have been poor laboratory technique (I'm being charitable here, and not suggesting that it was deliberate fraud).
Planets do not naturally generate nuclear fusion. Nuclear fusion occurs in stars, where the extreme heat and pressure at the core allows hydrogen nuclei to merge and form helium, releasing energy in the process. Planets lack the conditions necessary for sustained nuclear fusion reactions.
The costs of nuclear fusion energy are currently high due to the complexity and advanced technology required for fusion reactions. Research and development costs are significant, as well as costs associated with building and maintaining fusion reactors. However, advancements in technology and increased investment in fusion energy could help lower costs in the future.
Nuclear fusion doesn't produce energy.
I currently use nuclear fusion.
Nuclear fusion does not currently occur in nuclear plants. Nuclear plants use nuclear fission, where atoms are split to release energy. Fusion reactions, in which atomic nuclei combine to release energy, are not yet used commercially for electricity generation.
Yes, it is possible (beam target fusion).
Planets do not naturally generate nuclear fusion. Nuclear fusion occurs in stars, where the extreme heat and pressure at the core allows hydrogen nuclei to merge and form helium, releasing energy in the process. Planets lack the conditions necessary for sustained nuclear fusion reactions.
Nuclear fusion occurs at the core of the sun (and other stars) providing huge amount of energy to the rest of the solar system. It has also been achieved on Earth, though not in a controlled and sustained manner.
The nuclear fusion is not used now as a source of energy; probable possible in a far future.
There is very little similarity between present day power plants which use nuclear fission, and any possible nuclear fusion plant of the future
The costs of nuclear fusion energy are currently high due to the complexity and advanced technology required for fusion reactions. Research and development costs are significant, as well as costs associated with building and maintaining fusion reactors. However, advancements in technology and increased investment in fusion energy could help lower costs in the future.
The plasma current plays a crucial role in nuclear fusion by helping to confine and control the hot, charged particles in the plasma. This current generates a magnetic field that keeps the plasma stable and prevents it from touching the walls of the fusion reactor, allowing the fusion reactions to occur efficiently. In essence, the plasma current is essential for maintaining the conditions necessary for sustained nuclear fusion reactions.
Nuclear Fusion
The main challenges in developing and implementing nuclear fusion technology include achieving sustained fusion reactions, managing high temperatures and pressures, and finding materials that can withstand the harsh conditions. Additionally, funding and political support are crucial for advancing research and overcoming technical hurdles. Addressing these challenges requires collaboration among scientists, engineers, and policymakers to ensure progress in nuclear fusion technology.
At this time:in a bomb, very cheapin a reactor, not yet possible
Fusion is a nuclear reaction.
The very smallest "stars" in the galaxy are brown dwarfs. These are starlike objects that have failed to produce sustained nuclear fusion.