0
What else can I help you with?
What are some unreliable source?
Wikipedia can sometimes mislead readers because anybody can put information on that website.
How do you ensure that your sources online are reliable and is Wikipedia a valid academic source of information for research papers in this class?
The sad truth is that you don't. Wikipedia averages 4 mistakes per page, therefore is an unreliable source of information. But that doesn't mean that most of the info is wrong. Just be aware of using Wikipedia on reports etc. You can always trust a textbook.
Why is wikipedia a unrealiable source?
People say that Wikipedia is an unreliable source because anyone can change what it says, however, if moderators catch someone making a stupid edit, they will return the text to it's original so Wikipedia is a reliable source.
Why are encyclopedias a poor source of primary information?
They are unreliable.
Is Wikipedia unreliable?
No. Wikipedia is not unreliable. It is a service that provides free information across 500 million people a month. People CAN get in and edit information. Most of the time the information is accurate and when it is inaccurate, others change it pretty quickly.
Is a blog a reliable source?
No. Blogs contain opinions and ranting. They are unreliable.
How do you tell the difference between a reliable source and an unreliable source?
Only experience can tell you that. A source whose information checks out when compared to reality (e.g. other sources) is usually reliable, while a source whose data turns out not to match reality would be considered unreliable.
Did Christian Bale die?
He is not dead. Wherever you heard that is an unreliable source of information
What action might you take to convince others that this is an unreliable source about ancient Greece?
The first thing you would do is state what 'this' source is.
Can you cite Wikipedia as a source in your research paper?
No, it is generally not recommended to cite Wikipedia as a source in a research paper because it is not considered a reliable or scholarly source.
Is it acceptable to cite Wikipedia as a source in my research paper?
It is generally not acceptable to cite Wikipedia as a source in a research paper because it is not considered a reliable or scholarly source.
When would a secondary source be considered unreliable?
A secondary source may be considered unreliable if it is based on incomplete or biased information, lacks credibility or expertise, or has not been properly fact-checked or verified. It is essential to critically evaluate the source's authoritativeness and accuracy before using it for academic or research purposes.
