0
What else can I help you with?
Why did federalists and anti federalists clash over the ratification of the constitution?
Because the federalists wanted the constitution and the anti-Federalists didn't, because the anti-Federalists wanted a smaller government and were afraid the Constitution would take away their freedom.
Did anti-federalists favor a strong centralized government?
No, they believed that the Constitution would take away the rights Americans had fought for against Great Britain. That the Constitution would create a strong central government, ignore the will of the states and people, and favor the wealthy over the common people. Antifederalists preferred a local government close to the people. 1.
What ways did the anti federalists criticize the constitution?
The anti federalists criticized the constitution because they felt that it would give too much power to the federal government and take away the rights of the states and local government branches. The anti federalists argued that the constitution provided for a centralized form of government rather than a federal government form.
Where did the debate between Federalists and Anti Federalists take place?
The debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists primarily took place during the ratification of the United States Constitution in the late 1780s. It unfolded in various public forums, including state ratifying conventions, newspapers, and pamphlets, where each side presented its arguments. Federalists, favoring a strong central government, and Anti-Federalists, advocating for states' rights and individual liberties, engaged in vigorous discussions across the nation. Key documents, like the Federalist Papers, were also instrumental in articulating Federalist perspectives.
How did the federalist respond to concerns from the antifederalists?
Answer on E2020:The Federalists created a system of checks and balances in the government. This system limited the power of the various branches of government so that one branch could not take all the power and become tyrannical. Each branch was also able to 'check' the powers of the other branches, so that no branch could act alone.
How did federalists and the Antifederalists try to convince people to take their sides in the debate over the constitution?
Propaganda
How did the federalists and the antifederalists try to convince people to take their sides in the debate over constitution?
Propaganda
What position did the federalists take on the constitution?
Federalists wanted the constitution. They supported Federalism (if you couldn't already tell from their label). Antifederalists opposed the Federalist views. They believed that the constitution took to much power from the states and thought it did not guarantee people's rights.
What were the positions of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists?
Federalists were for a strong federal government and didn't think that the Bill of Rights is necessary for the government to run without corruption. Anti-federalists thought that the Constitution didn't properly protect their rights like a Bill of Rights would do. However, in the end the Federalists let the anti-federalists have the Bill of Rights.
How did the federalists and the anti federalists try to convince people to take their side in the debate over the constitution?
sorry i dont know im a dumb butt
Why did federalists and anti federalists clash over the ratification of the constitution?
Because the federalists wanted the constitution and the anti-Federalists didn't, because the anti-Federalists wanted a smaller government and were afraid the Constitution would take away their freedom.
How did the Federalists try to convince people to take their side in the debate over the Constitution?
bob joe nad fred and dredckdeicd
How did the Federalist and the antifederalists try to convince people to take their sides in the debate over the constitution?
Propaganda
What was the Anti-Federalists' main concern about the Constitution?
The anti-federalists believed that the Constitution would take away critical powers from the states, and warned that without a Bill of Rights the government might also take away the rights of the people that were just won in the Revolution.
How did the Federalists and anti-federalist try to convince people to take their side in the debate over the constitution?
sorry i dont know im a dumb butt
Did anti-federalists favor a strong centralized government?
No, they believed that the Constitution would take away the rights Americans had fought for against Great Britain. That the Constitution would create a strong central government, ignore the will of the states and people, and favor the wealthy over the common people. Antifederalists preferred a local government close to the people. 1.
In what way did the antifederalists the constitution?
The anti-federalists did not criticize America's new constitution as much as were opposed to it. They were opposed to the concept of central, federal governance; instead they believed that each of state needed to be be strong because they are a bit suspicious about concentrating all the power into one, central government. They were concerned that the Constitution was mostly crafted by the upper-class and thus would minimize the influence of the common people and the poor.The anti-federalists were the first to raise the concern that the lack a Bill of Rights would take away the people’s right to freedom of speech and religion; however their concerns were reduced with the inclusion of the Bill of Rights.
