No The Bible does not have any errors in it.
___
It depends on who you talk to what answer you are going to get. I believe that there are translation errors, yes, after having it passed down and retranslated so many times by many people, some of which had an agenda and made mistakes or changed things on purpose... although I also think you can still get a lot of good out of it and that there are many incredible truths contained in the Bible. Other people think that it is perfect as is. Other people don't think that it is inspired by God at all.
A:
Spelling mistakes and grammatical errors in a translation are a different thing to spelling mistakes and grammatical errors in the originals. But yes, they did exist. Mark's Gospel has attracted attention because, while the author displays considerable skill in the Greek language, he wrote in a clumsy and ungrammatical style, some say deliberately.
Answer
As far as the English translation, the King James version in particular seems to have no mistakes, although it is not the first English translated Bible.
A:
Since the Bible does actually contain errors, contradictions and inconsistencies, the answer must be no. Raymond E. Brown (An Introduction to the New Testament) says that inspiration does not guarantee historicity or reconcilability.
Yes. Little or nothing in the Bible seems to have been written by women. And the Bible can not have been the work of God. If it had been it would surely not contain the many errors and inconsistencies that it does contain.
A:Yes, there are numerous historical and archaeological errors in the Bible. We therefore have to decide whether to continue to believe it is inerrant and, if so, what we mean by this. Some would say the Bible is inerrant on matters of faith, but not necessarily on history. Others would say if we find apparent errors in the Bile, then we have misunderstood the text, possibly for many centuries, and must reinterpret it. Of course, others would say that the Bible is the truly inerrant word of God and can not contain errors, and that if we read the Bible with total faith then those errors will just disappear.
There are a number of websites that contain an online Bible concordance. The web domains "BibleStudyTools" and "BibleGateway," for example, each contain a Bible concordance.
NONE is Valid. for many reasons including the fact that,some of them contradicts each other and even our presently accepted Books of the bible. Often they contain historical,often they contain historical, chronological and geographical errors.
Some believe that the Bible is the word of God because it was literally told to the authors by God himself, and therefore is infallible. Others believe that the Bible was inspired by God and, although it can contain errors of history and science, it is infallible on matters of faith. There is no evidence of either. The Bible contains many errors of history and science, and is therefore not infallible. It contains many contradictions and inconsistencies on theology, and is therefore not even infallible on matters of faith.
Yes it does
that word is scattered all throuout the bible
Yes
Matthew 4
Acts
A:I am afraid there are far more than 52 errors in the Bible. Even if we accept the religious truth of everything in the Bible, there are very, very many scientific and historical errorsin the Bible, as well as contradictions and anomalies. The Bible is a book of faith, not a book of fact.
Some believe that the Bible is the word of God because it was literally told to the authors by God himself, and therefore is infallible. Others believe that the Bible is the word of God because it was inspired by God, although the books were the work of men, and although it can contain errors of history and science, it is infallible on matters of faith.