They're not the same, but they're related through Einstein's energy-mass equivalence principle, probably the most famous equation in all of science: E = mc2.
They are not the same, no.
Kinetic energy is equal to one half the mass times the square of the velocity. Thus, changes in velocity and mass do not have the same effect on kinetic energy. If you increase the mass by a factor of 10 at the same velocity, you increase the kinetic energy by a factor of 10. However, if you increase the velocity by a factor of 10 at the same mass, you increase the kinetic energy by a factor of 100.
The question makes no sense - you can't consider two variables at once - energy and mass. Most energy for the same mass - hydrogen.
Nuclear fission produces energy 2.5 million times that of carbon of same mass. Nuclear fusion produces energy 400 times that of nuclear fission of same mass.
because energy equals mass times speed of velocity squared, if an object has greater energy, that energy can also format into mass, a cold object weighs less than the same object that is hot.
EM radiation carries energy without a mass-carrying medium. In that sense, they are energy in pure form. However, considering Einstein's mass-energy equivalency (E=mc2), EM energy can, in rare circumstances, be converted to mass at a rate of 300,000,000 Joules/kilogram, and mass converted to energy at the same rate.
Energy and matter(mass) are not the same! Energy = mass x c^2 !
No. Mass and kinetic energy are not the same thing.
Kinetic energy is equal to one half the mass times the square of the velocity. Thus, changes in velocity and mass do not have the same effect on kinetic energy. If you increase the mass by a factor of 10 at the same velocity, you increase the kinetic energy by a factor of 10. However, if you increase the velocity by a factor of 10 at the same mass, you increase the kinetic energy by a factor of 100.
Twice the mass of the electron, since the positron has the same mass of the electron. Or the equivalent, in energy units.An electron has a mass or energy of 511 keV.
The same as everywhere else. Every mass has associated energy. Every energy has associated mass. Possibly this question is about the energy output of stars. Usually, the more mass a star has the higher its rate of energy output.
Yes... and that mass would be Zero. Photons don't have mass.
Assuming the larger mass is moving at the same speed as the original mass, the kinetic energy will double.
None. There is no such thing as mass-to-energy conversion: both mass and energy are conserved! The total mass before and after a nuclear reaction is the same; so is the total energy. For more information, read the Wikipedia article on "binding energy".
Law of Conservation of Energy
The question makes no sense - you can't consider two variables at once - energy and mass. Most energy for the same mass - hydrogen.
Kinetic Energy = (1/2)*(mass)*(velocity)2 If you double the mass, then the kinetic energy will double If you double the velocity, the kinetic energy will increase by a factor of 4
I do not think there is anything that does not require matter. Matter has mass, and mass is the same as energy, so if something does not have mass or energy, it does not exist. Even the smallest elementary particle, the muon neutrino, has energy; therefore it has mass; therefore it is matter.