Science posits that life is spontaneously created by natural forces.
The religious viewpoint is that life was created by a supreme being in the universe.
The conflict between science and religion in 19th century was about the creation accounts.
Science does not study religion. As Stephen J. Gould says, science and religion operate, or ought to operate, in quite distinct magisteria. Science is the systematic study of the natural world, while theology is the systematic study of religion. Of course, if we regard theology as a science, then theology is the systematic study of religion and therefore of God's creation.
That it, and we, exist.
Glenn Gates Cole has written: 'Creation and science' -- subject(s): Bible, Bible and science, Creation, Criticism, interpretation, Religion and science
Frank Lewis Marsh has written: 'Evolution, creation and science' -- subject(s): Religion and science, Evolution, Creation
Sjoerd Lieuwe Bonting has written: 'Mens, chaos, verzoening' -- subject(s): Life, Religion and science, Theodicy 'Creation and double chaos' -- subject(s): Chaos (Christian theology), Creation, Religion and science
modernism emphasized science and secular values. fundamentalism fallowed traditional idea about religion
X. Y. has written: 'What is life?' -- subject(s): Religion and science, Creation, Spirit, Atoms
Creation Science Movement was created in 1932.
There is no science about creation. Creation is an unfounded myth with absolutely no evidence to support it. Try asking about evolution instead.
By creation of religion
Giorgio Bartoli has written: 'The Biblical story of creation in the light of the recently discovered Babylonian documents' -- subject(s): Religion and science, Creation, Bible and science 'The primitive church and the primacy of Rome' -- subject(s): Popes, Primacy