Most people I know wouldn't be bothered either way. THINK AGAIN. LETS BAN HOCKEY THERE ARE FIGHTS WITH STICKS,HOW BOUT AUTO RACING GUYS CRASH AND DIE. BAN FOOTBALL BIG MEN CRUSH BONES.DIRT BIKE RACING DOWNHILL SKIING. ANY SPORT THAT ONE COULD HURT THEMSELVES OR OTHERS BANNED. NOW TELL ME IF PEOPLE WOULD NOT BE BOTHERED EITHER WAY. I SUPPOSE THERE ARE SOME THAT NOTHING WOULD BOTHER THEM. RODHOOK
radios has impacted society because, without radio then it would be hard to transmit information and also communication. you could also go to....... http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/radio1.htm
Well for one, you need people to make a society. Would you like to be a little more specific?
It has made people in our society feel a lot safer than they would if violence was 100% acceptable.
No because it gives entertainment to the world. If it should be banned then why would it be in the Olympics? The TV shows are not real and the actual sport has so much health and safety involved in it these days there is almost no painful moves involved. If it was banned then a big percentage of almost every country would be unimpressed and some may even riot against the idea.
there would be boxing anymore
One Answer:No, I don't think that boxing should be banned even though it is a vicious sport and is the cause of many deaths and fatal injuries. Why ban boxing when it's YOUR CHOICE to watch it or not, it also is the boxers choice to go into the ring. Nobody physically forced him to participate, so why bother making a fuss that is basically nothing to do with you... You are not being injured and you are not in the ring.Taking away boxing would shatter boxers' (or people who one day aspire to be a boxer) dreams, as it may be the only thing they are good at. Also, if you take away boxing this would not be a democratic society and would take away the entertainment some people find in watching the sport.It is a sport that requires skill, stamina and self discipline. It is also a sport which provides opportunities for people who have not done well at school and keep young people of the streets doing drugs, doing things that are anti-social. Take Amir khan for instance he has a positive influence on boxing.Another Answer:Yes, because people might get hurt.Another Answer:Boxing should not be banned because people have fun watching it. If boxing ends people will be bored. Also, boxers will have no jobs.
Well it impacted the whole world but the country that was mostly impacted would be the U.S.
Why Would It Be Banned? , No
KICK-Boxing? Without a doubt not in the top 10. Football, Boxing, Soccer, Basketball, Baseball, Golf, Hockey, Tennis, NASCAR, INDY Racing. Are all more popular than Kick-Boxing. If you are just talking about BOXING, and not KICK-Boxing than Boxing would rank 4th (Football, Baseball, and Basketball would be ahead) Around the world it would rank 3rd (Soccer and Basketball)
boxing would make you stronger and more defensive but i would recommend learning the Martial arts
It greatly depends on the ethics and moral code of the society in which you were raised. What would upset and cause regret in a person from one society would be barely or unnoticeable to someone from a different one.
Some boxing training DVDs would be "Kelly Coffrey's 30 Minutes to Fitness", "Position-Specific for Boxing", and "Techniques and Drills for Championship Boxing"