if a is bigger than b and b is bigger than c a must be bigger than c... Transitivity
it can be 1,2,3 b/c the statement can be true
If A > B & B > C
Then A >C
0.89 or 0.890
Theorem
I don't think that there is a number bigger than its square as you are timesing the number Not true. Any number between 0 and 1 is bigger than its square.
An example of a conditional statement is: If I throw this ball into the air, it will come down.In "if A then B", A is the antecedent, and B is the consequent.
Step 1: Formulate the statement to be proven by induction. Step 2: Show that there is at least one value of the natural numbers, n, for which the statement is true. Step 3: Show that, if you assume it is true for any natural number m, greater or equal to n, then it must be true for the next value, m+1. Then, by induction, you have proven that the statement (step 1) is true for all natural numbers greater than or equal to n. Note that n need not be 1.
true
A+
not b not a its contrapositive
if a is true, then b must be true
No, it must not be true.
Every statement apart from the axioms or postulates.
yes E=mgh and as bigger includes both >>m and >>h you can see how E is greater with bigger.
The 'answer' is the number that 'x' must be in order to make the statement true. If 'x' is anything different from -7, then the statement "x = -7" is not true. So the 'answer' must be -7 .
true
The statement is false. The word "greater" must be replaced with the word "less" in order to make the statement true.
true, a rhino is bigger then a cat.
Neither statement is generally true.
true