If a surviving spouse is not named the beneficiary of a retirement account can this be contested?
if they did not name anyone else then yes it can be contested
2 people found this useful
This is a good question. The answer depends on what your are makingthe beneficiary designation for. That is, an estate, trust, lifeinsurance policy, IRA or retirement account,… bank account. Also,what is the total amount of your assets, are you in a communityproperty state? Finally, what do you want to accomplish. Also,estate plans and most policies and accounts allow you to dividebetween several beneficiaries and name successor beneficiaries, whotake the asset if the primary beneficiary fails to survive. The most basic answer to the question is then beneficiary should bewhoever you wish to receive the property when you die. For mostmarried couples with moderate estates, their estate planningdocuments, life insurance, etc., will name their surviving spouseas the beneficiary. Where the estate is sizable enough sometimesthe couple will establish particular gifts for children.Particularly if there are children of a prior marriage orrelationship. For gifts going to minors (under the age of 18), most states have aversion of the Unified Transfer to Minors Act. This act (generally)places a minor's property into the hands of a custodian. A courtorder is required to access (withdraw) the funds in the account.The entire account comes under the minor's control when they reachage 18. (In California, you can delay this to age 21, but you mustinclude the directions in your estate plan.) As an alternative,where the funds are substantial or require significant management,a guardian of the Minor's estate may be required. The custodian or guardian is normally appointed by the court, butyou can specify one in your estate plan. To avoid a custodial account or guardianship, or delaydistributions beyond age 21 (in California) you will need toestablish a trust for your minor child. The good news is that thiscan be an "empty trust" (holds no assets) until your death. Some assets, as a general rule, should always designate a person asthe beneficiary (or beneficiaries). Life insurance and IRA inparticular. Life insurance policies are income tax free to thebeneficiary (but included in your gross estate for estate tax- moreon that in a bit.) So, designating a beneficiary other than yourtrust or estate makes the most sense. IRAs (Traditional IRAs) have an additional reason to name realpeople as beneficiaries. You may recall that IRA distributions aretaxed as income. When a person, or persons, inherit a IRA accountas a designated beneficiary they can: 1) Cash out immediately; 2)Cash out over a five year period; 3) Take the IRA as an "inheritedIRA" requiring them to take a required minimum distribution andallowing them to take additional distributions as needed. While themoney they receive is still taxed as income, they can stretch theliability over many years- and they can grow the IRA without payingtaxes (except on distributions.) Better yet, they can designatetheir own beneficiaries and continue this cycle for generations.(Until the feds change the rules.) In contrast, if your estate or trust is the beneficiary of atraditional IRA, they must cash out immediately (Trusts and estatescannot "own" and IRA). As trusts and estates pay the some of thehighest income tax rates, this usually is not the optimum answer. And, of course, if you name no beneficiary for your life insuranceor IRA, the assets are subject to probate which may increase costof administering your estate. Estate tax planning is less of an issue under the current rules,except for very large estates. The current exclusion amount for2016 is $5,450,000 (it increases annualy until the feds change therules.) Also, the surviving spouse gets the benefit of both anunlimited marital deduction (all property going to the survivorescapes estate tax) and portability (where the survivor gets theunused portion of the deceased spouse's gift and estate tax.) Of course, this is for Federal Estate Tax- some states may have anestate tax (based on the amount of the decedent's estate) or aninheritance tax (based on the amount the beneficiaries receive), orboth. What this means is that a married couple can effectively shieldmore than $10,000,000 of property passing to their heirs with avery simple estate plan. For larger estates (or estates anticipated to grow substantially),there are some additional estate planning devises to avoid estatetax. An ILIT (Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust) is one. An ILIT isa trust which owns an insurance policy on your life, and becauseyou do not "own" the trust the policy is not included in yourestate for estate tax calculations. But, they are irrevocable, soyou can not change your mind latter. And, ILITs have otheradministrative, cost and tax considerations associated with them,so a careful analysis is required for their optimal use. As you can see, the question of "Who should be the beneficiary?" isa more complicated question than it appears, and the advice of aqualified estate planning attorney is generally worthwhile andrecomended.
If no beneficiary is named on the life insurance policy is the surviving spouse the default beneficiary?
Answer . Life insurance is a great thing: you can ensure that a loved one will continue to have the life style that they are accoustmed to should you pass on. When the poli…cy was applied for, a beneficiary should have been named. The beneficiary can be changed at anytime (just contact the company and ask for a beneficiary change form). But never the less the proceeds WOULD go to a surviving spouse if there is not a designated bene at the time... Just as the rest of your "estate" would (unless you had a trust). A life insurance policy is its own trust/ legal document and would go to the spouse based on your "union" between man and woman. I suggest clarifing your intentions for the proceeds by naming a bene. Good luck. What if the deceased also had a minor child who was not the child of the surviving spouse?
In New Jersey is the surviving spouse responsible for credit card debt when the account was solely in the name of the deceased spouse?
Answer . \nNo, New Jersey is not a community property state.\n. \nIt does however recognize Tenancy By The Entirety when it pertains to real property. Therefore the famil…y home will pass directly to the surviving spouse and not be subject to probate unless the titling to the property is otherwise worded.
Answer . \nIf the couple resided in a community property state it is possible for the surviving spouse to be responsible for debt incurred by a deceased spouse even though… he or she was not an account holder. Texas and Wisconsin are not considered "true" CP states as they treat solely incurred marital debt somewhat differently as do the other CP states.
Is surviving spouse the legal beneficiary of a life insurance policy if a different beneficiary is named?
No, the spouse is not. The beneficiary is named. There are laws that require the spouse to sign an acknowledgement that there is life insurance that she is not the beneficia…ry of.
Yes. In most states in the United States a spouse cannot be disinherited by a will. The spouse can file a claim under the doctrine of election. By filing such a claim, the sur…viving spouse is generally awarded an intestate share of the estate. You should consult with an attorney in your jurisdiction who can review your situation and explain your options.
Can you contest a beneficiary of investment accounts if they are not married to or a relative of the deceased?
No. The owner of the account has the right to choose the beneficiary and that account does not become a probate asset or part of the estate.
Is the surviving spouse the legal beneficiary of a life insurance policy if no one is named beneficiary?
The policy would default to the Estate. which in most cases the spouse would be the executor of the estate. however, it would have to go through probate court first, so you al…ways want to have a primary beneficiary a life insurance policy.
Who gets insurance money if deceased had children not children of surviving spouse and no named beneficiary?
The proceeds would be paid to the estate and then would pass according to the provisions in the will or the state laws of intestacy if there is no will. Generally those childr…en would inherit an intestate share. You can check the laws of intestacy for your state at the related question link provided below.
It is doubtful. Check the divorce decree, as it may specify that certain things had to be changed.
A son can contest a will on behalf of the surviving spouse. The existence of a PoA before death has no affect.
The legal system generally will allow you to contest anything you like. However, you chances of changing a designated beneficiary on someone else's IRA are slim. If you decide… to contest a beneficiary, recommend you contact an attorney for advice.
Can your fathers wife contest and receive your fathers annuity account if you are named the beneficiary of the account before they were ever married?
She can contest it, but she won't win. Another View: While the above answer MAY wind up being true - too little is known of the circumstances to give a 'blanket' answer. Mo…re information would have to be known about the annuity - it's administrators rules - the laws of your particular state - etc - etc.
The spouse should be the beneficiary.
When one spouse dies in a joint policy and no beneficiary is named do the proceeds default to the joint spouse that has survived?
No, but you may need to ensure that the spouse if you are estranged cannot make a claim against this as an estate in the event of anything happening to you if that is what you… want.
Can you contest the beneficiary of an investment account if the account holder is deceased and was incompetent?
Yes, you can contest the beneficiary if you have evidence that the beneficiary was designated by an incompetent person.