First of all, Nibiru doesn't exist. Second of all, there are eight planets now that Pluto has been demoted, so Nibiru (if it existed) would be the ninth planet.
If a distant star has a slight back and forth motion then it may be located near a planet. The gravitational force of the planet will cause the star to move.
Meteoroids become meteors -- or shooting stars -- when they interact with a planet's atmosphere and cause a streak of light in the sky. Debris that makes it to the surface of a planet from meteoroids are called meteorites.
possibly weathering & erosion. When ever it moves around it could break or get smaller or weaker/softer
Water in a donkey's ear does not typically lead to death and is not an unusual occurrence for donkeys, due to the size of their ears. However, it can possibly lead to infection which may cause fatal complications.
The original 1968 version of "Planet of the Apes" had 4 sequels": "Beneath the Planet of the Apes" (1970) "Escape from the Planet of the Apes" (1971) "Conquest of the Planet of the Apes" (1972) "Battle for the Planet of the Apes" (1973) The 2001 re-imagining (remake) "Planet of the Apes" is a stand alone film.
There is no such planet. This is all a myth. The only thing I could find on Nibiru is Wormwood a star that is mentioned in Revelations. People say it's going to arrive here in 2012 and cause a poleshift, but personally I think it's a bunch of Bull. Nibiru is not the planet you are looking for, it is Marduk or Planet X which are the same.
No one knows yet, but there are some people and also scientists that believe that there is a planet called Nibiru , and people say that Nibiru is headed to earth but others say that there is no planet called Nibiru....also there is another planet called planet X but I think that the results will be that if the world doesn't end on 12.22.12 then the world will never end if the sun doesnt cause anything. Even scientists have no clue yet but maybe is just a myth so the world might never end!
it does not exist.
No. Believers of the Nibiru Cataclysm Theory claim that Nibiru, a large, planet-like object, has some sort of 3600 year orbital period with relation to Earth. The founder of the "theory," Nancy Lieder, claimed that Nibiru is a terrestrial planet four times Earth's size. She claimed that she knew this because of psychic powers she received from a communications device implanted in her brain by large grey aliens called "Zetas," which supposedly want to warn Earth of its oncoming doom. Lieder's original prediction for the collision of Earth and Nibiru was May, 2003. She claimed that the perihelion of comet Hale-Bopp was a ruse, to draw attention from the approach of the titanic (for a terrestrial) planet. When no cataclysm occurred, she removed her original posts about it on her website (including on that suggested people should put down and eat their pets in preparation for the disaster). When asked about it, she claimed that it had been a ruse of her own, to throw of the government. She said that if the world's governments knew the true date of the cataclysm, they would have time to enforce martial policy and effectively massacre their citizens (she gave no explanation for why this would be done). Since its founding, the Nibiru Cataclysm Theory has snowballed into several pseudoscientific cults, some of which have incorporated religious beliefs into the original "theory." Many do not even acknowledge the original founding, and some even claim support for it in religious texts. As for the origin of the idea for "Nibiru," it has much less theatrical beginnings. 'Nibiru' is the term assigned to Jupiter by ancient Babylonian astronomers. Since the reawakening of curiosity about the idea of a large planet that can cause disaster, many planets, and other objects, have been purported as "Nibiru." People have claimed the planets Ceres, Neptune, Pluto, Eris, and Sedna are Nibiru, simply mislabeled. Other cults have now decided that Nibiru is not a planet at all, but is an enormous star (the star V838 Monocerotis is often referred to by followers of the myth as Nibiru). The title "Planet X" is a not, despite what many say/think, out of ignorance, a reference to "Nibiru." Supporters of the myth have claimed that "Planet X" is the name that NASA has given to Nibiru, as part of a cover up (they have explained the denial of Nibiru's existence by astronomers as a large conspiracy). However, the term "Planet X" is an unofficial nickname given to new planet candidates that don't have a name, before a permanent title is assigned. Pluto was once referred to as "Planet X" before being named 'Pluto.' "Planet X" no more refers to a specific planet than "John Doe" refers to a specific hospital patient. Regarding the ancient Mayan calendar, Nibiru is not suggested, except by conspiracy theorists, to be related to the dreaded apocalypse of 2012. The Mayan calendar was organized into a series of "Creation cycles," or ages. It marked 4 ajaw, 4 k'ank'in, December 21, 2012, as the end of a creation cycle, and therefore the beginning of a new one. There was no prediction of disaster. The idea that there will be some sort of catastrophe in 2012 is simply another pseudoscientific speculation, resulting in a modernized myth. Media, particularly Hollywood, has made great advantage of people's doubts and suspicions about an ancient prediction, resulting in even further confusion. This has, as can be expected, been incorporated into parts of the Nibiru doctrine, resulting in claims by some cult members that the rumored disaster of 2012 will be either a collision with or a passing over of Nibiru. In synopsis, no, absolutely no evidence whatsoever suggests that Earth is going to collide with anything, let alone something as large as "Nibiru" (which would be as large in the sky as the sun, if it really were going to collide with us anytime soon, assuming it could exist). All empirical evidence currently suggests that Nibiru is simply a pseudoscientific myth, and that Earth is completely safe from outside threats.
There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of the mythical city of Atlantis. The story of Atlantis sinking into the ocean is a legend and not based on geological events or science. Global warming, as understood in the modern context, did not cause Atlantis to submerge.
No Atlantis is not real. It is a lost Continent. (Only lost cause it was never found.) Atlantis was said to be a magical world under the sea. When people went to look for what do you think they found nothing!!
Yes we have a duty of care towards the planet because we have the power to cause disastrous changes to the environment which if unchecked could cause mass extinctions of species including possibly human life. So it's more self-interest than protecting the planet, which will still be orbiting the Sun a billion years from now.
Because of this, we always see (basically) the same side of the Moon. This is called "orbital lock". It stabilizes the spin of our planet, possibly making all life possible - but I digress. The moons of Mars are too small in mass to achieve this orbital lock and the planet wobbles on its rotation, possibly leading to its unstable climate.
'cause the star is self luminous and the planet is not .
2012
not on this planet.
yes it does cause i got that in my essay