He is more pro choice,
He ruled on parental notification in support, to have parents be notified of a child's abortion. He might be more accurately described as pro-parents. According to a New York Times article (7/11/03) regarding this decision, Justice Wells wrote: ''The community, acting through the state, has an exceedingly compelling interest in having parents parent their children. How can a parent be expected to act responsibly without notice?''
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F06E7D6103DF932A25754C0A9659C8B63
democrat, i think
A republic according to Wikipedia.
dxcfbhjnkml, bugers
Yes
is he pro life.
That is a question for the voters of Florida to decide.
Charles Evans Hughes was a Supreme Court Justice before he ran for President in 1916. William Howard Taft was appointed Chief Justice of the Supreme Court after his presidency.
I was just looking for the same thing--found this, it may be helpful-(see Related Links, below).
Supreme Court Justice Charles Evans Hughes
is he pro life.
According to Project Vote Smart, Justice James E.C. Perry has no party affiliation.
John Rutledge was an Associate Justice from 1789 to 1791 and Chief Justice in 1795. Charles Evans Hughes was an Associate Justice from 1910 to 1916 and Chief Justice from 1930 to 1941.