Not really. There is mention of some of Bilbo's relatives, but none of them have any real role in the story. Though the movie version is going to play up on it and will actually have Frodo in the story, even though Frodo isn't born until 30 years after Bilbo returns from his adventure.
It shouldn't be. The publisher is just trying to take advantage of the movie for marketing purposes.
Yes Frodo is in the Hobbit in the movie yes I believe so in the book because i read it twice not two long ago. NOTE: Frodo is in Peter Jackson's 'The Hobbit' movies, but in Tolkien's legendarium, Frodo is not even born until 27 years after 'The Hobbit' ends, and Samwise, Merry, and Pippin are not born for more than a decade after that.
The hobbit is much shorter than a dwarf. Hobbits do not have beards.
The Hobbit begins on or around April 25, 2941. It ends on or around June 22, 2942.
The story has been consistent since Tolkien made some revisions at the time of the release of the Lord of the Rings to make the two stories consistent.
His eyesight was better than the dwarves. He was able to see the boat on the other side of the river.
The Hobbit is considered the prequel and occurs about 60 years in time before the Lord of the Rings. It is about how the One Ring came back to knowledge in Middle-earth after being hidden for so many years.The Silmarillion contains portions of the events from the beginning of Middle-earth right up to the destruction of Beleriand and the destruction of Numenor. It is far more like a history book than a story.The Hobbit. It tells of the life and adventures of Bilbo Baggins, Frodo's uncle. A movie is being made called "The Hobbit" in 2012. Peter Jackson comes back to direct another masterpiece.This may be slightly pedantic, but just to be precise:Technically the book The Lord of the Rings doesn't have a prequel. A prequel is written after a publication in question but describes the events that happened before the events in said publication.The Hobbit (book) was written before The Lord of the Rings. The Lord of the Rings is the sequel to The Hobbit, but The Hobbit is not the prequel to The Lord of the Rings.However, the movie The Hobbit is the prequel to The Lord of the Rings movie.The Hobbit
There is no one called 'Tookish'. 'Took' is a Hobbit family/clan name, a clan known for being more adventurous than others. To be called 'Tookish' it generally means that a Hobbit is descended from Tooks (ie, Bilbo Baggins, from his mother Belladonna Took) and feeling the call of adventure.
Because he is more than 300/500 years I don't remember.
There is more than one conflict in The Hobbit. The conflict with society would be with the river elves or Bilbo interactions with the dwarves as a group. But there is man vs man, man vs society, man vs enviroment
The Hobbit is set about 60 years before most of the events in The Lord of the Rings.The Hobbit was published in 1937. The Lord of the Rings did not come out for over 20 years after that. It took Tolkien a long time to write the follow up.
There is more than one aswer. 'The Hobbit', 'The Silmarillion', and 'The Lord of the Rings' are three. There are other works that mention them - 'Unfinished Tales' is one - but these are the main ones.