Senator Jackson's incendiary speech angered the crowd.
Senator Jackson's incendiary speech angered the crowd.
In the sentence "Senator Jackson's incendiary speech angered the crowd," the highlighted word "incendiary" functions as an adjective. It describes the noun "speech," indicating that the speech was likely provocative or inflammatory, contributing to the crowd's anger.
In Senator Jackson's incendiary speech, the part of speech that likely angered the crowd was his use of strong, emotionally charged adjectives and verbs. These words would have heightened the intensity of his message, provoking strong reactions from the audience. Additionally, any inflammatory language or rhetoric aimed at opponents could have further fueled their anger. Overall, his choice of provocative language played a key role in eliciting a passionate response.
Provocative speech or annoying speech
The word "incendiary" can be both an adjective and a noun. As an adjective, it describes something capable of causing fires or provoking violence. As a noun, it refers to a person who deliberately starts fires or stirs up conflict.
Senator Charles Sumner was the Massachusetts representative. He wrote a speech against slavery and was beaten by Senator Preston Brooks when he read it to the other senators.
Senator Joseph McCarthy's attempts to limit free speech
In February, 1950 a little-known senator from Wisconsin made a speech in WHEELING, WEST Virginia. The senator, Joseph R. McCarthy, charged that the State Department was infested with communist agents.
No. This senator would be excersising his freedom of speech, if we could sue someone for this, the courts would be full of these cases.
New York, according to Senator Arlen Specter in a recent speech.
Cato the Elder.
Marcus Porcius Cato