answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

One of the most basic arguments against restricting civil liberties is that the government does not, or should not, have the power to do so in the first place. Many argue that restricting civil liberties violates freedoms protected in the Constitution.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: The basic argument against restricting civil liberties?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was the important argument against the proposed constitution?

it did not guarantee basic rights


What was an important argument against the proposal constitution?

it did not guarantee basic rights


Basic argument for restricting civil liberties during war?

During times of conflict and change civil liberties are challenged. Societal views and values do not change as easily as political belief, and people hold on to the views they were previously taught.


What is a basic conflict?

a basic conflict is a fight or argument


Who needed to protect the basic liberties?

Bill Of Rice.............Rights


What guaranteed basic liberties and indicated some swing away from federalist centralizing?

The Bill of Rights guaranteed basic liberties, such as freedom of speech. The passage of the Bill of Rights signaled a swing away from federalist centralizing.


What is John Stuart Mill's basic point?

John Stuart Mill's basic point is that individuals should have the freedom to act as they please as long as their actions do not harm others. He believed in the importance of individual liberties and the protection of minority opinions against the tyranny of the majority.


What is the maximum limit for bonus provision?

Bonus is 8.33% of basic plus DA but restricting it to 3500/-


What did the Nation Assembly Give to its charter of basic liberties?

The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen.


Believed the Constitution should provide protection for certain basic liberties?

anti-federalists


What generalization about democracy is most valid?

Democratic governments protect basic civil liberties


Can an Argument be Noid?

No, an argument cannot be void. An argument can be weak, flawed, or unconvincing, but it still retains its basic structure and content. A void argument would imply that there is no argument at all.