0
Contemplation is an activity of the mind -- it is thinking.
Meditation has *nothing* to do with thinking.
Meditation is about awareness, about that which lays
beyond mind, beyond thought, beyond feeling.
Why not find a meditation technique that "feels right"
and give it a try for a while?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between speculation and theory?
A speculation is the contemplation or consideration of a topic. A theory is a series of tested speculations.
What are the difference between mediation and negotiation?
Mediation is a process, commonly a third party is brought into Mediate a conflict Reconcilliation is when two party's reach an agreement. Commonly a contract between business and employees or married persons get back together.
What is the difference between advocacy and mediation?
To me, a mediator, one who does the mediation, seeks to bring conciliation and reconciliation to both sides and a advocate, one who brings advocacy, represents the plaintiff in one side of the argument.
What is the difference between conciliation and mediation?
Though the two terms have a number of similarities, there are also some differences between conciliation and mediation, no matter which definition is used. In both cases, a neutral third party seeks to help two, or possibly more, opposing sides find a suitable resolution to a conflict. In some cases, the differences between conciliation and mediation definitions will determine how that neutral third-party acts. No universal definition currently exists for these alternative forms of dispute resolution, but there are still some distinct differences. In some cases and jurisdictions, the differences between conciliation and mediation are determined by the amount of power the third party has. In mediation, the mediator will facilitate a discussion between the parties, and may or may not offer opinions on the strength of each side's argument. When no opinion is offered, it is called facilitative mediation. In cases where an opinion is offered, it is evaluative mediation. Overall, no matter which method is chosen, the mediator still does not have the right to impose his or her will on the two parties. This could be the major difference based on some definitions of conciliation and mediation. For example, a conciliator will not only offer an opinion on the relative strengths of the case, but also issue a binding opinion, if the parties agree to that ahead of time. The opinion offered is likely to be based on the law, but may factor in other less concrete considerations if the parties agree. This type of dispute resolution process is often more formal, simply because the decision will be binding, at least on a temporary basis. In some localities, the difference between conciliation and mediation is the same as the difference between facilitative mediation and evaluative mediation. In other words, under this definition of conciliation, the conciliator can still offer an opinion, but that opinion has no legal weight, though it may be based on legal concepts. Therefore, unless the parties agree, the conciliator's opinion makes no difference, but it may be used by one party or the other in court to bolster a case. No matter what definition is used, the major difference between conciliation and mediation ultimately is the power of the third party. In all cases, conciliation gives slightly more power to the third party than the mediation. Conciliation or mediation may be ordered by the court system as a way of resolving disputes and relieving some of the pressure on court calendars. This is especially true in the case of marriage dissolution in some countries, though it could also be used for labour disputes, or nearly any type of contract disagreement.
What is difference between mediation and conciliation?
Though the two terms have a number of similarities, there are also some differences between conciliation and mediation, no matter which definition is used. In both cases, a neutral third party seeks to help two, or possibly more, opposing sides find a suitable resolution to a conflict. In some cases, the differences between conciliation and mediation definitions will determine how that neutral third-party acts. No universal definition currently exists for these alternative forms of dispute resolution, but there are still some distinct differences. In some cases and jurisdictions, the differences between conciliation and mediation are determined by the amount of power the third party has. In mediation, the mediator will facilitate a discussion between the parties, and may or may not offer opinions on the strength of each side's argument. When no opinion is offered, it is called facilitative mediation. In cases where an opinion is offered, it is evaluative mediation. Overall, no matter which method is chosen, the mediator still does not have the right to impose his or her will on the two parties. This could be the major difference based on some definitions of conciliation and mediation. For example, a conciliator will not only offer an opinion on the relative strengths of the case, but also issue a binding opinion, if the parties agree to that ahead of time. The opinion offered is likely to be based on the law, but may factor in other less concrete considerations if the parties agree. This type of dispute resolution process is often more formal, simply because the decision will be binding, at least on a temporary basis. In some localities, the difference between conciliation and mediation is the same as the difference between facilitative mediation and evaluative mediation. In other words, under this definition of conciliation, the conciliator can still offer an opinion, but that opinion has no legal weight, though it may be based on legal concepts. Therefore, unless the parties agree, the conciliator's opinion makes no difference, but it may be used by one party or the other in court to bolster a case. No matter what definition is used, the major difference between conciliation and mediation ultimately is the power of the third party. In all cases, conciliation gives slightly more power to the third party than the mediation. Conciliation or mediation may be ordered by the court system as a way of resolving disputes and relieving some of the pressure on court calendars. This is especially true in the case of marriage dissolution in some countries, though it could also be used for labour disputes, or nearly any type of contract disagreement.
How is mediation used in labor negotiation?
Mediation is used to settle disputes between laborers and their employers. Federal mediators may step in, in some cases.
What is cultural mediation?
The term might refer to mediation used between two sides of different cultures, or two sides fighting over some aspect of culture.
What is the job of a mediation attorney?
The job of a mediation attorney is as follows: negotiating and settling problems between two parties or people, preparing court reports and facilitating discussions.
When was Contemplation EP created?
Contemplation EP was created in 2006-07.
Can you use mediation in a sentence?
Since the parties did not wish to go to court, they went into mediation to solve their dispute.
Compare mediation with groups and mediation with individuals?
Group mediation is not considerably different from those mediations involving individuals. Mediation is the practice of dispute resolution between two or more Parties. The Parties can consist of individuals, groups of individuals, corporations, neighbors, etc. The fundamental structure of the mediation remains unchanged, regardless of Party structure. The mediation is conducted by a trained individual, or group of individuals, that specializes in dispute resolution. The Parties engage the mediation in a manner that allows each of the Parties to be heard, and seek a mutual resolution to the problem(s), through course of self-determination. Tennessee-Mediation.com Staff http://www.tennessee-mediation.com
A sentence with contemplation in it?
My brain was weary from thinking after having spent many hours in contemplation.
