No, John the Apostle and John the Baptizer were two different people. John the Baptizer was arrested and beheaded by Herod, whereas John the Apostle lived past the crucifixion to write the Gospel, his 3 letters and Revelation.
John the Baptist beheaded Mark 6:27
Mark 14:33 John the Apostle with Jesus in Gethsemane.
No. He felt Jesus should baptise him.
Yes
yes
No.
The apostlr Paul was not baptized in water.Acts 9 v 18 records of Paul '...and (he) arose and was baptized.'Paul was baptised...read acts 22.16....Ananias asked him to be baptised in other to wash away his sins
There is no apostle named John Paul. There is an apostle named John and another apostle named Paul.
He called himself the Apostle to the Gentiles.
jesus christ
There is no apostle named John Paul. There is an apostle named John and another apostle named Paul.
Paul wasn't stoned - he was beheaded.
Yes, Paul from the New Testament is considered to be an Apostle. He is often referred to as the "Apostle Paul" and played a significant role in spreading Christianity throughout the Roman Empire.
Jesus, baptized by John the Baptist -- Matthew 3:14 The Ethiopian eunuch, baptized by Philip -- Acts 8:38 Crispus, baptized by Paul -- 1Corinthians 1:14 Gaius, baptized by Paul -- 1Corithinas 1:14 Stephanas, baptised by Paul -- 1Corinthians 1:16
OpinionI would say Apostle Paul wherever I use 'Apostle' as a title, in the same way as I would say Mr Smith, with 'Mr' capitalised. Less frequently, I would write 'apostle' uncapitalised if I did not intend it as a title, for example where 'apostle' is the subject of the sentence, and Paul is addressed. Use capitals to be on the safe side.
Luke was a companion of Paul, and not a apostle.
no
he was not