If you were a white American whose family was killed by Nat's rebellion, no, it wouldn't be seen as right at all.
However, if you were a slave whose family's freedom was nonexistent and had to endure atrocities against you, then the rebellion was seen as right and necessary.
In modern times, though there are some who still try to swing either way, it really isn't that simple to say it was right or wrong as it is to say it was inevitable because of events and actions leading up to it.
In my opinion, no. 55 innocent people were murdered based on a "vision" Turner had.
Nat Turner's Rebellion
Yes, Nat Turner was wrong when he decoded to attack and kill people.
Nat Turner was a slave in the antebellum days in the South. In 1831 he masterminded a slave rebellion, which was a bold statement with little chance to succeed. It failed and Nat Turner was hung for the rebellion he led on November 11, 1831.
Nat Turner's owner at the time of his rebellion was Joseph Travis. sike *&$#
No, Turner wasn't a cowboy, but he was the leader in his rebellion, or revolt
Nat turner lead a rebellion on slavery and i love you justin siegrist
I'm pretty sure it was Nat Turner in Nat Turner's Rebellion
Nat Turner's owner at the time of his rebellion was Joseph Travis. sike *&$#
Nat Turner's Rebellion
Nat Turner
Nat Turner
Yes, Nat Turner was wrong when he decoded to attack and kill people.
Nat turner led a rebellion but I don't know what Denmark Vessey did.
Nat Turner was a slave in the antebellum days in the South. In 1831 he masterminded a slave rebellion, which was a bold statement with little chance to succeed. It failed and Nat Turner was hung for the rebellion he led on November 11, 1831.
Nat Turner's owner at the time of his rebellion was Joseph Travis. sike *&$#
Nat Turner's Rebellion
Nat Turner :)