Ulysses S. Grant was neither poor nor very rich in his lifetime. He is said to of lived above his means, but was not poor at all. He was just an average person.
He was rich and abandoned the rich life.
The poor were envious of the easy life the rich people had
poor
A tailor in colonial times was neither rich or poor, but lived a modest life. The tailors in that time period were needed by both the rich citizens and the poor.
life was hard
No, she had such a rich life, surrounded with money!!
He seems to have had a life that was neither very rich nor really poor.
The quality of life depended on whether you were rich or poor. If you were rich you could have a good and easy life. But if you were poor you could have a rough and hard life, often ending up in the workhouse or early death.
He was born in Southern Ohio where he grew up. His parents were not rich, but his father worked hard , was respected in the community and supported his family adequately. He was appointed to West Point ans so had a good education .
The quality of life depended on whether you were rich or poor. If you were rich you could have a good and easy life. But if you were poor you could have a rough and hard life, often ending up in the workhouse or early death.
life in the 14th century was harsh and the families were varied some were rich some were poor the poor struggled in life more than the rich as when the plague came the poor couldn't afford medicines
very bad not as good as the rich