1. Reproduction
Information (DNA is used for life on Earth) is accurately replicated.
2. Variation
Changes in parts of the information caused by mutation or recombination.
3. Selection
Individuals with changes that give rise to increased reproductive success, will tend to have more offspring. This will spread that advantageous change through the population.
Changes that reduce reproductive success will lead to less offspring and so are "weeded out" by selection.
Overproduction, variation, selection, and adaptation
No. Intelligent Design is not a viable theory since it does not explain all of the steps nor provide any evidence to substantiate its claims. As a result, the Theory of Evolution remains unchallenged by it.
The formation of life on earth has little to do with evolutionary sciences, which deal how lifechanges, not how it begins. The formation of life has as little to do, specifically, with evolution as it does with cell theory, or biogeography, or diet of organisms, or photosynthesis... it's a prerequisite for these processes.
Evolution is a process, theories of evolution are theories which explain that process
It is called "evolution".
yup i want hack steps evolution
You can find an overview of stelar evolution in the Wikipedia article entitled "Stellar evolution".
Even in punctuated equilibria there are no distinct "steps" in evolution. But a single significant event can be pointed out common to the evolution of both lineages: the initial divergence of the ancestors of whales and humans from a common ancestor, thought to have taken place between 70 and 60 million years ago.
Overproduction, variation, selection, and adaptation
No. Intelligent Design is not a viable theory since it does not explain all of the steps nor provide any evidence to substantiate its claims. As a result, the Theory of Evolution remains unchallenged by it.
The English language has evolved in many ways over the years. To know which of those steps are most important, though, the choices need to be given.
The formation of life on earth has little to do with evolutionary sciences, which deal how lifechanges, not how it begins. The formation of life has as little to do, specifically, with evolution as it does with cell theory, or biogeography, or diet of organisms, or photosynthesis... it's a prerequisite for these processes.
star birth, protostar stage, main sequence stage, red giant stage, then burnout and death
Theory of evolution refers to animals and plants evolution along the time. Language evolution is another issue, not entirely related to the theory of evolution. It follows the theory of evolution on some way but it is related to culture evolution, not to the physical attributes evolution.
Micro-evolution is not only a part of macro-evolution, it is the same mechanism as macro-evolution. Macro-evolution includes speciation, as a result of continuing micro-evolution.
Evolution is a process, theories of evolution are theories which explain that process
Through evolution the population of the species was growing.Through evolution the population of the species was growing.Through evolution the population of the species was growing.Through evolution the population of the species was growing.Through evolution the population of the species was growing.Through evolution the population of the species was growing.Through evolution the population of the species was growing.Through evolution the population of the species was growing.Through evolution the population of the species was growing.Through evolution the population of the species was growing.Through evolution the population of the species was growing.