0
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)
The Supreme Court held that states had the right to create separate but equal accommodations in intrastate (within the state) transportation and other public facilities as long as there was a legitimate reason for creating the statute. In Plessy, the Court cited the states' right to exercise its police powers to avoid whatever problems it may have anticipated as a result of allowing integrated travel.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 10y agothe court reasoned that laws calling for separate facilities for whites and blacks were acceptable as long as facilities were equal. students will probably disagree with the courts proposition because the facilities for blacks were never equal to those for whites there for it was not separate but equal.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoPlessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)
Pass segregationist, or Jim Crow, laws.
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoJim Crow laws, which involved segregation and other violations of African-Americans' civil rights.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did supreme court establish separate but equal in Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 and why was it constitutional?
The Supreme Court established "separate but equal" in Plessy v Fergusun in 1896 to match the ruling of Brown v Board of Education. It was ruled constitutional because the Brown v Board of Education had already started the desegregation rule.
How did the Supreme Court rule in Plessy vs Ferguson?
The case from 1896 held that "separate but equal" in public services was NOT racial discrimination. Read about the case here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson
Was Homer Plessy sent to jail after his trial in the US Supreme Court?
No. Plessy didn't have a trial in the US Supreme Court; they heard an appeal of his case. After the Court made its decision, Homer Plessy was rearrested for the original "offense" on January 11, 1897 (according to a New Orleans warrant) and paid a $25 fine, but was not sent to jail.More InformationThe Supreme Court considered Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896) under its appellate jurisdiction, meaning they reviewed the decisions of the lower courts on appeal, to ensure the Constitution was being upheld, but did not conduct a trial or rule on Plessy's guilt or innocence. By the time the case reached the Supreme Court, the issue under consideration was whether the Louisiana Separate Car Act that required racial segregation in railroad transportation violated the 13th and 14th Amendments of the Constitution.Homer Plessy's trial was before Judge John Ferguson (the Ferguson named in the case) in the Criminal District Court for Orleans Parish. Plessy refused to enter a plea, arguing instead that the Separate Car Act was null and void because it violated his constitutional rights under the 13th and 14th Amendments. He was found guilty without entering a plea.Plessy's attorney then appealed and filed for a writ of prohibition (an order from a higher court to a lower court preventing the court from exercising its jurisdiction) in the Criminal Court of Appeals, then in the Louisiana Supreme Court, and finally in the Supreme Court of the United States.Homer Plessy didn't actually enter a "guilty" plea until January 11, 1897, more than four months after the Supreme Court ruled on his case.Homer Plessy was rearrested for the original "offense" on January 11, 1897, according to a New Orleans warrant, and paid a $25 fine, but was never sent to jail.Case Citation:Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)
When did the US Supreme Court rule 'separate but equal' was constitutional in Plessy v Ferguson?
No. Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896) established the "separate but equal" doctrine when the US Supreme Court upheld a Louisiana law requiring African-American and white travelers to ride in separate train cars.The US Supreme Court overturned the ruling in Plessy in Brown v Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), stating that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal."Case Citation:Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)
What year did the Supreme Court rule segregation to be legal?
1896The US Supreme Court formally ruled a Louisiana Law that required segregated facilities in intrastate railroad transportation was constitutional in the case Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896). This allowed the states to pass racist Jim Crow laws without fear that the courts would overturn them.Case Citation:Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)
How did the court rule in plessy?
It constitutionaliszed the "Seprate, but Equal" doctrine.
On what question did the US Supreme Court rule in Plessy v. Ferguson?
The US Supreme Court ruled on the question of whether racial segregation was constitutional under the "separate but equal" doctrine in Plessy v. Ferguson. The Court held that segregation was constitutional as long as the separate facilities provided for different races were equal in quality, thereby establishing the doctrine of "separate but equal." This decision subsequently justified racial segregation and discrimination for several decades.
Who can rule that federal laws are unconstitutional?
(Supreme Court)
Can the state Supreme Court over rule the federal Supreme Court?
No
What supreme court diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
What supreme court case diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
What is important to remember about Plessy v. Ferguson?
The most important thing to remember is that the US Supreme Court can and has made major errors of judgement. Seven Justices stated that Seperate But Equal was valid and the Law of the Land. It required 58 years for the Court to over rule its own decision in Brown vs Board of Education, but the damage that it had caused will require several more generations to correct.
