* The Nazis didn't give a monkey's about human rights and condemned the concept as alien and 'un-German'. Nazi ideology claimed that human rights were only championed by the weak. * Some SS personnel had fought against Soviet forces in the Russian Civil War of 1918-1921 or against Communists in Latvia. This war had been conducted with utter savagery by both sides. Some of these people returned home steeped in brutality.
The Nuremberg Trials were carried out and quite a large number of Nazi party members were tried for crimes against humanity. A result of these trials was the famous "just following orders" defense, which most civilized militaries including the US do not allow as a defense, if you are breaking the law you have an obligation not to follow an order. Additionally governments such as France carried out their own trials, much later and for mostly purposes of getting the truth out, they tried collaborators who helped the Nazis in their own country. Lots of good came from these trials, they initiated the development of international human rights law, which didn't exist beforehand. It paved the way for the trials for genocides in Rwanda and Bosnia. Lots of investigation has also taken place into assets that were stolen by the Nazi's and restitution has been made in many cases.
____
All that was after the Holocaust and too late. The simple answer to the question is none.
Where? In Germany? And which laws, in particular, are you asking about? Human-rights laws? Private-property laws? Criminal statutes? six ponted star.
They created legislation so that the atrocities committed could be called 'human rights violations'.
The Holocaust is an example of extreme violation of human rights. Human rights laws strive to ensure that such a situation will never occur again.
Ethnic cleansing involves the violation of all human rights and especially the right to life, liberty and property.
Just about all of them. Pretty much(and this is true) the only rights they had were to walk, stand, and run
Because 9 million innocent people were killed
after the Holocaust it was realised that crimes of this nature had no actual laws defining them.
The Holocaust is an example of extreme violation of human rights. Human rights laws strive to ensure that such a situation will never occur again.
Ethnic cleansing involves the violation of all human rights and especially the right to life, liberty and property.
In the broadest sense, it is a human rights violation not to treat a human being like a human being. Racism is the intentional relegation of an ethnic community to a sub-human state, and thus is not, eo ipso, a "violation" of human rights, but it *is* indicative of an attitude which would *want* to violate human rights.
Just about all of them. Pretty much(and this is true) the only rights they had were to walk, stand, and run
The contravention of human rights by an institution such as the military or police is what is termed violation, while the contravention human rights by an individual on the victim is termed abuse. Charles Ohene-Amoh
The cutting into a child for any reason other than medical emergency is a violation of human rights, assault, and child abuse.
When a Government imposes restriction on the free movement,freedom of expression of its citizens, these will definitely be considered as human rights violation by the Government.
Because 9 million innocent people were killed
Violation of human rights
The violation of human rights
how does the violation of human rights affect the self esteem of a person
All of the above -Internvention to prevent US government official from committing a human rights violation - refusal to follow a clearly illegal order to commit a human rights violation - intervention (through moral dissuasion and non-violent means) to prevent a member of the partner nation military from committing a human rights violation