Lamarck thought characteristics, such as a giraffes long neck were caused by them stretching it during their lives and passing that onto their offspring - saying acquired characteristics were passed on through genetics.
What actually happens is natural selection, which means the giraffes born with long necks (by slight mutations or chance) survived better than the ones with shorter necks, as they were able to eat better, so they were able to breed and pass on the genes for long necks where the short necked giraffes died. This theory was thought of by Darwin.
Lamarck thought that evolution could be 'determanistic' - i.e directed by what the animal 'wanted' to become. Giraffes for example, would gain very tall necks by stretching them towards high trees. In reality while the outside environment constrains evolution, the processes that create differences between organisms are non-deterministic and random. Giraffes gained long necks because those with long necks survived longer and produced more offspring.
Lamarck thought that the inheritance of acquired characteristics was the process that brought about evolutionary change. The evolution of longer and longer necks in giraffes, for example, happened because individuals' necks became longer through stretching throughout their lifetimes, and they passed on this characteristic to their offspring.
Lamarck missed the Darwinian explanation for change - the natural selection of heritable variations, variations that occur regardless of what the individual 'tries' to do.
Although the Darwinian explanation fits the evidence in most circumstances, epigenetic inheritance, which does have a flavor of 'Lamarkism', does occur. See the related link.
All species were descended from other species
Acquired characteristics can be inherited
,
voting registration polls
Arthur Holmes
A theory is a guess at what the result of something will be, based on what is already known about it. Theories will often remain unchanged, unless new evidence is found that suggests the theory is incorrect - if this is the case, the theory will be modified in order to better reflect the new evidence
Perhaps the earliest documentation of evolution can be traced to Xenophanes (b. 570 BC). He recognized that the rock in which the fossils were found had at one time been submerged mud. He explained theexistence of fossils by saying that the world evolved from a mixture of earth and water. It was long recognized that older layers of fossile-bearing rock contained different, more primitive forms of life than later layers, but no scientific consensus explaining how this happened was found until Origin Of Species was published by Charles Darwin (b. 1809) in 1859. Darwin proposed the mechanism of survival of the fittest, but had no knowledge of genetics. Biologist and monk Johann Gregor Mendel (b. 1822), whose work was ignored during his life, proposed a mechanism for heredity by hypothesizing that traits, such as eye color or height or flower hues, were carried by tiny particles that were inherited whole in the next generation. DNA was first isolated by the Swiss physician Friedrich Miescher (b. 1844) in 1869, and in 1953 James D. Watson (b. 1928) and Francis Crick (b. 1916) suggested what is now accepted as the first correct double-helix model of DNA.
Reject it and think of a new one. A hypothesis is a temporary explanation for some observation. It is then tested and, if found to be incorrect, a new one has to be formed. 1st, he/she could do the experiment again,2nd he/she could check his/her procedure if it is reasonable,3rd, he/she can do it again and again and see if there is a pattern in results.
Use and Disuse Theory
It was his theory. When data was finally collected (near his death), it was found that his theory was (sort of) wrong.
i believe it would be incorrect
Incorrect. Most forests are elsewhere.
It's not, your information is incorrect.
he was the founder who found out the phlogiston theory was incorrect with Antoine lavoisier
All the calibers made in can be found in various books on Sharps. Proposed will never be known.
The people that found it. It is proper usage in the English language.
The idea was first proposed by Descartes in 1637.
"Inheritance of acquired traits", one of the implications of this would be that if an individual broke a bone and it did not heal correctly then that individual's children would likely be born with this "new acquired trait" of that bone already broken and improperly healed instead of having a normal bone in that location.
Niels Bohr
A hypothesis is a temporary explanation for some observation. It is then tested and, if is found to be incorrect, a new one has to be formed. If found to be correct, it becomes a theory. If that theory is later found to have a counter-example it is modified (hypothesis -> theory - same process) or a completely new hypothesis proposed and tested. The hypothesis alwasy comes before the theory. it is a practical explanation that the scientist develops that accounts for a theory.