0
. A Formal leader is a member of organization who has given authority by virtue of his position to influence other members of organization to achieve organizational goals. Formal leaders are given leadership based on their position with a group. They are actually assigned to be leaders as part of their role in the group. Examples of formal leaders would be the teacher in a classroom or the manager within a company. The formal leader has a job to organize and direct group members to meet the goals of the organization or team. Many stakeholders are attached to the formal leader.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the major arguments opposed to formal leadership in an organization?
According to the text of "Leadership: Research Findings, Practive, and Skills - Fifth Edition" by Dubrin, there are three arguments opposing formal leadership; substitutes for leadership, leader irrelevance, and complexity theory. The text states the following: Substitutes for leadership include closely knit teams of highly trained individuals, intrinsic satisfaction, computer technology, and professional norms. When members of a cohesive, highly trained group are focused on a goal, they may require almost no leadership to accomplish their task. Intrinsic satisfaction is when employees who are engaged in work they find strongly self-motivating, or intrinsically satisfying, require a minimum of leadership. Their task itself grabs the worker's attention and energy. Computer technology such as computer-aided monitoring and computer networking can take over many of the supervisor's leadership functions. The computer provides productivity and quality data, and directions for certain tasks can be entered in to the computer systems. When professional norms are incorporated by workers they often require a minimum of supervision and leadership. According to the theorizing of Jeffrey Pfeffer, leadership is irrelevant to most organizations. Rather, it is the situation that must be carefully analyzed. Factors outside the leader's control have a larger impact on business outcomes than do leadership actions. And high-level leaders have unilateral control over only a few resources, and is usually limited by obligations to stakeholders. The complexity theory holds that organizations are complex systems that cannot be explained by the usual rules of nature. Leaders and managers can do little to alter the course of the complex organizational system.
What is delegative leadership?
Delegative leadership is a form of leadership whereby the leader will delegate decision making to subordinates. This is considered to be an inclusive type of leadership.
What is an example of democratic leadership?
There are a number of things that could be examples of democratic leadership. Holding elections is an example of democratic leadership.
What is the formal definition of business?
what is a formal company
What are the conditions necessary for effective price leadership?
what are the conditions necessary for price leadership
Can self leadership replace formal leadership in an organizational setting?
Self-leadership can complement formal leadership in an organizational setting by empowering individuals to take control of their own actions and development. However, formal leadership is still necessary for providing direction, setting goals, and aligning the team towards a common vision. Both forms of leadership are valuable and serve different purposes within an organization.
Which type of group leadership calls for more formal relationships with group members?
Authoritarian leadership typically calls for more formal relationships with group members, as the leader has full decision-making power and control over the group. Members are expected to follow instructions and adhere to the leader's directives in a hierarchical structure.
Which type of leadership interaction is most formal?
Mentoring
How do managers acquire the power needed for leadership?
How do managers acquire the power needed for leadership?
What is a constitutional leadership style?
Governing in a constitutional style of leadership means that a person follows formal proceedings closely. In addition, the constitutional laws must be flexible so that changes in leadership style can fit with the current times.
Sample letter for team leader position?
A sample letter for a team leader position should highlight your leadership sills. If you do not have any formal team leader experience, leadership in civic organizations can be used instead.
What is a status leader?
Status leadership is associated with formal and informal positions such as Permanent Secretary or Director of Education, Education officer, Principals, supervisor and teachers.
Different type of leadership?
One can categorize the exercise of leadership as either actual or potential: * actual - giving guidance or direction, as in the phrase "the emperor has provided satisfactory leadership". * potential - the capacity or ability to lead, as in the phrase "she could have exercised effective leadership"; or in the concept "born to lead". In both cases, as a result of the constancy of change some people detect within the late 20th and early 21st centuries, the act of learning appears fundamental to certain types of leading and leadership. When learning and leadership coalesce, one could characterize this as "learnership". Leadership can have a formal aspect (as in most political or business leadership) or an informal one (as in most friendships). Speaking of "leadership" (the abstract term) rather than of "leading" (the action) usually implies that the entities doing the leading have some "leadership skills" or competencies. ---------------------from WIKIPEDIA------------------------------------------ www.wikipedia.org
What has the author T O Jacobs written?
T. O. Jacobs has written: 'Leadership and exchange in formal organizations' -- subject(s): Industrial Psychology, Leadership, Organization, Psychology, Industrial, Research 'A guide to the strategic leader development inventory' -- subject(s): Leadership, Handbooks, manuals, Command of troops, Handbooks, manuals, etc, Ability testing, Strategic Leader Development Inventory
Can you do without leadership?
Leadership often serves as a guiding force to coordinate team efforts and navigate challenges effectively. In its absence, decision-making may become fragmented, communication may suffer, and group cohesion might falter. While some tasks can be accomplished without formal leadership, a lack of direction and vision may hinder overall success in more complex or dynamic environments.
What is CEO Matthew Barrett's leadership style?
Barrett, who preferred to be called "Matt" over the more formal "Matthew," was long seen as an employer who stressed communication with his employees and the importance of ethics in the banking industry.
What are the major arguments opposed to formal leadership in an organization?
According to the text of "Leadership: Research Findings, Practive, and Skills - Fifth Edition" by Dubrin, there are three arguments opposing formal leadership; substitutes for leadership, leader irrelevance, and complexity theory. The text states the following: Substitutes for leadership include closely knit teams of highly trained individuals, intrinsic satisfaction, computer technology, and professional norms. When members of a cohesive, highly trained group are focused on a goal, they may require almost no leadership to accomplish their task. Intrinsic satisfaction is when employees who are engaged in work they find strongly self-motivating, or intrinsically satisfying, require a minimum of leadership. Their task itself grabs the worker's attention and energy. Computer technology such as computer-aided monitoring and computer networking can take over many of the supervisor's leadership functions. The computer provides productivity and quality data, and directions for certain tasks can be entered in to the computer systems. When professional norms are incorporated by workers they often require a minimum of supervision and leadership. According to the theorizing of Jeffrey Pfeffer, leadership is irrelevant to most organizations. Rather, it is the situation that must be carefully analyzed. Factors outside the leader's control have a larger impact on business outcomes than do leadership actions. And high-level leaders have unilateral control over only a few resources, and is usually limited by obligations to stakeholders. The complexity theory holds that organizations are complex systems that cannot be explained by the usual rules of nature. Leaders and managers can do little to alter the course of the complex organizational system.
